[secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-cose-webauthn-algorithms-06

Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 26 May 2020 23:51 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D29F3A0BE2; Tue, 26 May 2020 16:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: cose@ietf.org, draft-ietf-cose-webauthn-algorithms.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.1.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <159053708200.16306.10159573848968846851@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 16:51:22 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/v7QUEwpAC_t9R2zcLvpMULWAqgE>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-cose-webauthn-algorithms-06
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 23:51:22 -0000

Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review result: Not Ready

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
 Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
 last call comments.

This document is to list down the COSE&JOSE Algorithms to be registered to
IANA. But it seems the description is not complete. In the Section 2: among the
4 algorithms listed under RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5, three are NOT recommended, one is
deprecated. Under the Security Consideration (Section 5), Section 5.2 describes
why SHA-2 is "Not Recommended", Section 5.3 describes why SHA-1 is
"Deprecated".  What about the description on why SHA-512,  SHA-384, and SHA-256
are not recommended?  Is the missing description intended?

Best Regards,

Linda Dunbar