[secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 26 October 2016 19:34 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33BF5129984; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:34:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.131
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.131 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SAmMUCYPvLaL; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:34:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com [23.79.238.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48EB01296FA; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8291433506; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:24:51 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com [172.27.118.251]) by prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7AD443340E; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:24:51 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; s=a1; t=1477509891; bh=VECYaGvMlcL6mOVgOAuOAWoVB+RgMhNpRf9DTLU7jfw=; l=3719; h=From:To:Date:From; b=kmeIcVus8oCgGHjWbqHiWMgiEzMYLJfJ8HbrDv9fS/xnZb4lFdLB3HgGrSV4Z7mkS qG2E1cwZkahZox/qPHITpKZf3EY/QEr4SAuCFCOcZOPxBAu2b/XMrCB0qDBn3mKe9j ZQ7SWoDgdFzsn8bdtoMgU63Y8LrI6/W6lsbMzlDQ=
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (ecp.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.123.33]) by prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F1A1FC8E; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:24:51 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 15:24:51 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1178.000; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 15:24:51 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "'secdir@ietf.org'" <secdir@ietf.org>, "'iesg@ietf.org'" <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Secdir review of draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch
Thread-Index: AdIvvibioqyXhlaeRu22KY4TaHKTEQ==
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:24:50 +0000
Message-ID: <26e31afc819f4af7884e831a8964f93a@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.47.64]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_26e31afc819f4af7884e831a8964f93ausma1exdag1mb1msgcorpak_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/vQ7uZ_EdRAh9JKCTrprtS8rjgQA>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:34:50 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

I found the Introduction section particularly useful and informative.  The security considerations seem complete and accurate.

In my view, this document is *Ready*

--
Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
Member, OpenSSL Dev Team
IM: richsalz@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz