[secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability

Magnus Nyström <magnusn@gmail.com> Tue, 16 June 2015 03:59 UTC

Return-Path: <magnusn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9883A1B2850 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 20:59:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qTXfo5Ihj-nA for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 20:59:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x233.google.com (mail-wi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 918AD1AD4A1 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 20:59:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wiwd19 with SMTP id d19so92059420wiw.0 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 20:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=DyXyXhKgS8mg3iGtRk1jCjdWIspK8HDocNVswP2wgPA=; b=IfA6hdY+FCed2+2iMjBe1fYoBCqQZrUEbFlkeNdiXqJqDyjI4uQfFrXwSFJjoA3ygV C5XjGw4f4uzesq8KASd/HVPJ5ngjS5JCGhTiNJ0ORdUb3tLdM7GUQJKaD3TXZ8I5kZPE pj1nOyNCsDi52TbwMv03cf5/v4fjfnhkdwa6hwjQsQWRA18DwKkVYN59A9LDPSpzJ/4N 1vhXagl9C2m6ugzwfNt9xg5YAFt8c3/qse4KbygWMUDaw13I8wOkcR59yi2LCH6rxyJS nY77HOe2UJAUJdakuxgJunFP1g5Wh7vfn/GDmEGZz58lAFoJxiVWjD4tTnbMqRVWloAa Zcig==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.37.230 with SMTP id b6mr2077079wik.14.1434427175298; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 20:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.187.243 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 20:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 20:59:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CADajj4ZexnEsQXWQ5ju1CV7EHYOaXabEYPphpXu2yVVGUwWZ6Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Magnus_Nystr=C3=B6m?= <magnusn@gmail.com>
To: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/vgOJB6oONqqGC8zSXnCyaRMsGXk>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 03:59:37 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

This memo provides operational feedback on LFA, highlights some
limitations, and proposes some refinements based on the found
limitations.

As such, the Security Considerations  seems adequate to me - it refers
to the foundational RFC 5286.

-- Magnus