Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-csi-send-cert-03
Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Thu, 17 June 2010 13:30 UTC
Return-Path: <kent@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18CE3A687A; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 06:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.926
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.926 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.681, BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_12_24=0.992]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t-PgCSa4mGPf; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 06:30:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.0.80]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E5183A68C1; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 06:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dommiel.bbn.com ([192.1.122.15]:34245 helo=[172.28.179.87]) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1OPFAe-000OTi-43; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 09:30:16 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240802c83efb82ef18@[10.242.10.156]>
In-Reply-To: <4C05F076.7050303@ericsson.com>
References: <00CEF527-9674-47CF-BC3E-66A9FC7289F7@bbn.com> <4C034A8C.9020205@ericsson.com> <BB5520A2-B0B8-4585-9D40-45AB8C591C4B@bbn.com> <4C05F076.7050303@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:07:31 -0400
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, The IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-csi-send-cert@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-csi-send-cert@tools.ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-csi-send-cert-03
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:30:28 -0000
At 1:47 AM -0400 6/2/10, Suresh Krishnan wrote: >>... > >Hmm. The ETA certificate itself does not need to have the RFC3779 >extension in it, but the relying party needs to fetch an RTA >certificate which will contain a RFC3779 extension. more precisely the ETA MUST NOT have such an extension. Steve
- [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-csi-send-cer… Richard Barnes
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-csi-send… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-csi-send… Richard L. Barnes
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-csi-send… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-csi-send… Stephen Kent