[secdir] Subject correction: Security directorate review of draft-allen-dispatch-imei-urn-as-instanceid

[Magnus Nyström <[e-mail]>]

Sorry for using the wrong Subject: line.
/M

On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Magnus Nyström <[e-mail]> wrote:

> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
>  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
> directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
>
> This avtcore document describes a new method for generating unique RTCP
> canonical names and obsoletes RFC 6222.
> The Security Considerations section seems adequate to me.
>
> (A few side comments:
> - RFC 6222 is mentioned in several places (e.g., Section 1, Section 8).
> Should it not also be a reference?
> - In Section 4.2, it is stated that, if the RTP endpoint is in a
> virtualized environment, then the MAC address may not be unique. In such
> cases, the host shall use the other presented option for short-term
> persistent RTP CNAMEs. I wonder if it in general is possible for an RTCP
> endpoint to deterministically determine if its MAC address is unique? It is
> not in general possible for a process to detect if it is running in a
> virtualized OS.)
>
> Thanks,
> -- Magnus
>