[secdir] SECDIR Review of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology-05
Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Thu, 28 May 2015 02:01 UTC
Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2201B2BB1; Wed, 27 May 2015 19:01:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MdmascZzrd7N; Wed, 27 May 2015 19:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22a.google.com (mail-lb0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35A611B2BB0; Wed, 27 May 2015 19:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lbcue7 with SMTP id ue7so18984212lbc.0; Wed, 27 May 2015 19:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Jbu5BKvbUp+nyx9k853WmDL07og2WUM070oiW48fmbQ=; b=iG9W2BqTDufvvvfZxxt9XiBLcZOBWZdk2Ow97aLMfxDhanB7WYBkSPi2e3J3yfYxie aSvymjggM8EMaAAEOlddUFRpThD+iQnb8Vx9JJYS5l17mCYb3ygApJJY+lakOrACyCOv l9p6Q8LOm/KghJFuYPWr8b8K697Wr3GfgIFVWCcNNWT5taCUPXgPfpsyiTsbaImgp9d2 BPpRwbCrS4rGN2q490aEqqmzNxlV+WBaJqAJfZ14CW63bSwhXG0NpHq5OJ/WyQQYwxi3 lKrUAoJlwHz1maY63X/fhSpCVgXEbgERAjjMTbv5hFeic7ydsBOxcPuj1xyMhJgq0p6H ixmQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.185.100 with SMTP id fb4mr306502lbc.79.1432778499663; Wed, 27 May 2015 19:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.203.163 with HTTP; Wed, 27 May 2015 19:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 22:01:39 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: MYNT_fMNuuPdwdVc_GPHZuqbXzQ
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwhhPfT5RxNTzfJ3uC3i8xktvgOnQj5DpS_wi44ngNK69A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
To: draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology@tools.ietf.org, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c3ca2283af4c05171abdc7"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/xOsEdeg5nAUfOO-r5MwtG2GuWt4>
Subject: [secdir] SECDIR Review of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology-05
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 02:01:42 -0000
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Summary: Ready Major Concerns: none The draft has a reference to a security considerations in an RFC that was published recently. The claim that the draft does not change the security model in ways that would require re-evaluation seems to be well founded.
- [secdir] SECDIR Review of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2… Phillip Hallam-Baker