[secdir] Secdir early review of draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs-02

Loganaden Velvindron via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 24 May 2021 14:45 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Loganaden Velvindron via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs.all@ietf.org, masque@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <162186754016.23166.6832667526146023583@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 07:45:40 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/yJQB1u1RvMQDFYdCwQWG0ao9J54>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir early review of draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs-02

Reviewer: Loganaden Velvindron
Review result: Has Nits

I'm reviewing the document as part of the Security Directorate (SECDIR). 

-Wireguard is mentioned in section 2.2 but there is no link to the design of
the wireguard protocol.

-In section 3.9, there are no mention of techniques such as padding to mitigate
the impact of traffic analysis. My understanding is that this is out of scope of the current
Internet Draft.

[secdir] Secdir early review of draft-ietf-masque… Loganaden Velvindron via Datatracker