Re: [secdir] Early SecDir Reviews

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Sun, 03 January 2016 00:45 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B781A8821 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Jan 2016 16:45:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -94.358
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-94.358 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BQVos1TNfqY9 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Jan 2016 16:45:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (unknown [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C39A01A8820 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Jan 2016 16:45:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=74.43.47.177;
From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'Russ Housley'" <housley@vigilsec.com>
References: <00e901d14435$0d92b950$28b82bf0$@ndzh.com> <F250E2F7-4CA0-4446-96FE-14BD915E1BD8@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <F250E2F7-4CA0-4446-96FE-14BD915E1BD8@vigilsec.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 19:45:00 -0500
Message-ID: <006801d145bf$fd4df5f0$f7e9e1d0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0069_01D14596.147AFB30"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQKUFkxonBTXeDmpyINqGwK33R98eAFpup72nVgFS8A=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/yJvI9tDsgYG6XHI9yHLhZfXfp8E>
Cc: 'Kathleen Moriarty' <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] Early SecDir Reviews
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 00:45:06 -0000

Russ:

 

Thank you for letting me know your comments have been addressed.  I will
review the section 2.4 and SEC-REQ-09 to address the overlap. 

 

Sue Hares 

 

From: Russ Housley [mailto:housley@vigilsec.com] 
Sent: Saturday, January 02, 2016 4:33 PM
To: Susan Hares
Cc: 'Kathleen Moriarty'; 'Stephen Farrell'; secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] Early SecDir Reviews

 

Sue:

 

I believe that my comments have been addresses.

 

I still see a great deal of overlap between Section 2.4 and requirements
SEC-REQ-09.

 

Russ

 

 

On Dec 31, 2015, at 8:37 PM, Susan Hares wrote:





Russ:

 

Just checking to see that all the issues you raised in for
draft-hares-i2rs-auth-trans on the SEC-DIR list:

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg05964.html

 

are answered in WG version of this draft:
draft-ietf-i2rs-protocol-security-requirements-01

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-protocol-security-requireme
nts/

 

I'm ready to send this to the IESG for publication, but in checking on the
SEC-DIR list,

I did not see an OK.

 

Thank you for all your help to improve this draft on I2RS protocol security.

 

Sue Hares