Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-kucherawy-authres-vbr

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Thu, 06 January 2011 18:40 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A86ED3A6F46; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:40:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.924, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FKAYBXyjuEex; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:40:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ht2-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht2-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.36]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D527B3A6F35; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:40:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by spite.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.72]) with mapi; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:42:13 -0800
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: David McGrew <mcgrew@cisco.com>, "draft-kucherawy-authres-vbr@tools.ietf.org" <draft-kucherawy-authres-vbr@tools.ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:42:12 -0800
Thread-Topic: SECDIR review of draft-kucherawy-authres-vbr
Thread-Index: AcutupEeVcqrZszkSzOCa5gOzXSQewAFqn/w
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F1341E73CFD@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <07F215F7-78DF-4B09-AF28-F75FF15FD9CD@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <07F215F7-78DF-4B09-AF28-F75FF15FD9CD@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:22:36 -0800
Subject: Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-kucherawy-authres-vbr
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 18:40:07 -0000

How about this replacing the second paragraph of Section 1:

   This memo thus registers an additional reporting property allowing a
   VBR result to be relayed as an annotation in a message header.

And at the end of Section 3, covering your Section 4 issues:

   Reactions to the information contained in an Authentication-Results
   header field that contains VBR (or any) results are not specified
   here as they are entirely a matter of local policy at the receiver.

-MSK