Re: [secdir] SecDir review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis

Varjonen Samu <samu.varjonen@hiit.fi> Fri, 22 April 2016 08:03 UTC

Return-Path: <samu.varjonen@hiit.fi>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2754712E7BD; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 01:03:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ftbEFCq3q-Hp; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 01:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from script.cs.helsinki.fi (script.cs.helsinki.fi [128.214.11.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A754912D8B3; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 01:03:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.214.10.115] (hpf-7.cs.helsinki.fi [128.214.10.115]) (AUTH: PLAIN sklvarjo, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,AES128-SHA) by mail.cs.helsinki.fi with ESMTPSA; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 11:03:48 +0300 id 00000000005A0111.000000005719DAE4.00002AE4
To: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
References: <F3AF3182-F31A-4EF8-8DC5-54B27B6ADC05@sn3rd.com> <bfbe20ee1196a22eadd854ce7090ffc7@nestor.otaverkko.fi> <2A372E02-DC5C-4791-91D8-20D4949D6383@sn3rd.com> <5710C137.30305@ericsson.com>
From: Varjonen Samu <samu.varjonen@hiit.fi>
Message-ID: <5719DAE3.4080405@hiit.fi>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 11:03:47 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In-Reply-To: <5710C137.30305@ericsson.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/yRezY5xK6Vv_zikUnRfPdLmm1f4>
Cc: draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis.all@tools.ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] SecDir review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 08:03:56 -0000

Hi,

addressed this nit with the following change

"

CERT parameters with the same group number
  in the Cert group field indicate a logical grouping.

"

This was the last open nit/comment in my knowledge for this document.

-Samu Varjonen

On 15/04/16 13:23, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
> Hi Samu,
>
> could you please revise the draft accordingly?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gonzalo
>
> On 10/04/2016 2:54 PM, Sean Turner wrote:
>> Thanks for the reminder:
>>
>>> On Feb 12, 2016, at 08:47, Samu Varjonen <samu.varjonen@hiit.fi> wrote:
>>>> Nits:
>>>>
>>>> nit 1: I read this a couple of times:
>>>>   CERT parameters with the same Cert group number
>>>>   in the group field indicate a logical grouping.
>>>> Isn’t it that the same group # is in the Cert group field:?
>>>>   CERT parameters with the same number
>>>>   in the Cert group field indicate a logical grouping.
>>> Is this about missing CERT word in the group field? Or did I misunderstand this question?
>> Yeah this is completely editorial; I think “Cert” is just in the wrong place.  Might be wrong.
>>
>> spt
>>