Re: [secdir] Security review of draft-ietf-pce-questions-06

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 10 July 2014 15:55 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AE061A0385; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:55:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vsQ7RfaOtJhf; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:55:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (asmtp3.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AB471A010D; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:55:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s6AFtRIr023142; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 16:55:27 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s6AFtP0C023084 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 10 Jul 2014 16:55:25 +0100
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Hannes Tschofenig'" <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>, "'Ben Laurie'" <benl@google.com>, "'IETF Discussion List'" <ietf@ietf.org>, <secdir@ietf.org>
References: <CABrd9SQYmSxOh+xBExkQ-iKGnG4dhZPBoR1U_iYLSG7kQCFE9Q@mail.gmail.com> <068f01cf9b53$7fc60b30$7f522190$@olddog.co.uk> <53BD05DF.7080709@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <53BD05DF.7080709@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 16:55:27 +0100
Message-ID: <0cbd01cf9c57$5f570520$1e050f60$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQH4uJ9KXH6Wajq6HAA2wc6J8Axr9gJ/ZfD4AZgXldmbJoAA0A==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1576-7.5.0.1017-20810.000
X-TM-AS-Result: No--20.513-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--20.513-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: L8tZF6zWW2rZeYBBoew7ALFNas5NPrTanaU0BOrP3M/F7duWDXiFErCx 9OEvXmLWxbiM85UWHqDqUmpMo8B4izPAnsAORqSfvHKClHGjjr1TqCCOtYNzZtp1biJhIyNRp7u eaEkDqTPmzWi0ELzEedxrFItJ4VaVHodpx3o6GrvXIwmz2YEJxYyzstdwoG+PnvbaEOoeixObJx j/y/77pNePBxJDl9ljSCqwxKAlXmr2De4YrmWQbqMVgdN9w+TCLn/JO5jDOiWbKItl61J/ycnjL TA/UDoApPKClyoUSzyNo+PRbWqfRJBlLa6MK1y4
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/yaenmelK0YrI29NkKx6SDraeOAA
Cc: iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] Security review of draft-ietf-pce-questions-06
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:55:33 -0000

Hannes,

You can say what you like, but I would appreciate not being misquoted on serious
matters even in jest.

Yes, you cut from my email correctly. Then you entirely missed the point and
reworded differently. That is neither helpful nor constructive. Doing so in a
sarcastic or caustic manner is not good for the atmosphere on this list.

>From time to time people complain to me (as AD, I'm an author for this document)
about the tone on this list and the way it harms participation of newcomers.
Please don't put yourself into that category.

Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net]
> Sent: 09 July 2014 10:06
> To: adrian@olddog.co.uk; 'Ben Laurie'; 'IETF Discussion List'; secdir@ietf.org
> Cc: iesg@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [secdir] Security review of draft-ietf-pce-questions-06
> 
> 
> 
> On 07/09/2014 10:55 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> > I would be pretty loathe to add security text to each section in this
document: I
> think that would make the document heavy and less likely to be read by its
> intended consumers
> 
> I like that one.
> 
> I think I will quote you in the future as someone who had said
> 
> "Adding security text to a specification makes the document heavy and
> less likely to be read by its intended consumers."
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes