[secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12

Rich Salz via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 30 April 2020 18:06 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 444C23A0E40; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:06:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Rich Salz via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: last-call@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org, draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc.all@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.128.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <158826997723.18783.269920443288910887@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Rich Salz <rsalz@akamai.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:06:17 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/zIOnpq-KEGKZGnJTtT9euSOVPPE>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 18:06:18 -0000

Reviewer: Rich Salz
Review result: Ready

I am the SECDIR reviewer for this document; the security directorate tries to
review all documents before they go to the IESG. This content is intended
primarily for the SecAD's, anyone else should consider this like other
last-call comments.

This document is READY.

This is a short doument. It defines a way for MPLS routers to indicate that
they can handle additional meta-data, "entropy labels" and depth of them, to do
traffic routing.

The security implications of this are well-discussed.