Re: [secdir] Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-ietf-ippm-rt-loss-03: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT): new (temp) draft?
Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Wed, 11 April 2012 18:12 UTC
Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67FCF11E80BA for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 813uRfqIw6wl for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omr16.networksolutionsemail.com (omr16.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1AC511E808D for <secdir@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cm-omr6 (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by omr16.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3BICCMv009641 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:12:15 -0400
Authentication-Results: cm-omr6 smtp.user=wes@mti-systems.com; auth=pass (PLAIN)
X-Authenticated-UID: wes@mti-systems.com
Received: from [107.50.114.182] ([107.50.114.182:46660] helo=[192.168.43.65]) by cm-omr6 (envelope-from <wes@mti-systems.com>) (ecelerity 2.2.2.41 r(31179/31189)) with ESMTPA id 99/7B-22382-A79C58F4; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:12:14 -0400
Message-ID: <4F85C96C.4050705@mti-systems.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:11:56 -0400
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Organization: MTI Systems
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
References: <20120406144445.4188.3196.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <201204061553.q36FrBRV007699@alpd052.aldc.att.com> <07e001cd14e0$41b408c0$c51c1a40$@olddog.co.uk> <201204080018.q380I1VK007743@alpd052.aldc.att.com> <099701cd15b1$fc18c990$f44a5cb0$@olddog.co.uk> <201204091344.q39Di1rK002725@alpd052.aldc.att.com> <0bea01cd168a$7ed8ae80$7c8a0b80$@juniper.net> <4F8578DE.1020808@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F8578DE.1020808@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 17:21:17 -0700
Cc: 'Al Morton' <acmorton@att.com>, secdir@ietf.org, "'Murphy, Sandra'" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>, afarrel@juniper.net, 'Samuel Weiler' <weiler@watson.org>, ippm-chairs@tools.ietf.org, 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>, adrian@olddog.co.uk, 'Dan Frost' <danfrost@cisco.com>, draft-ietf-ippm-rt-loss@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-ietf-ippm-rt-loss-03: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT): new (temp) draft?
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:12:21 -0000
On 4/11/2012 8:28 AM, Benoit Claise wrote: > Al, Wes > > I want to review this draft before the IESG telechat tomorrow. > However, it's getting difficult to keep track of the all the changes > between > - the posted version 3 > - the diff-03-04 you sent > - the extra proposal. > > What is the best way to proceed? > - Al, have you kept a temp version with all the changes? > - Are we shooting for "revised-ID" at the telechat? I could start my > review from there > - Do we want to have a version 4 posted now? > > What is the best way to proceed? I noticed Al sent a copy with updates that have been suggested so far. Please feel free to hit the "Defer" button if you don't feel there's adequate time to review this one; it looks like a busy telechat agenda this week! -- Wes Eddy MTI Systems
- Re: [secdir] Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-iet… Al Morton
- Re: [secdir] Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-iet… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [secdir] Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-iet… Al Morton
- Re: [secdir] Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-iet… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [secdir] Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-iet… Al Morton
- Re: [secdir] Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-iet… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [secdir] Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-iet… Benoit Claise
- Re: [secdir] Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-iet… Wesley Eddy
- Re: [secdir] Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-iet… Murphy, Sandra
- Re: [secdir] Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-iet… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [secdir] Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-iet… Al Morton