[secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis-02

Stefan Santesson via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 15 February 2021 09:19 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578073A0FD9; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 01:19:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stefan Santesson via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, regext@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.25.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <161338079230.21191.4755037249161520724@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Stefan Santesson <stefan@aaa-sec.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 01:19:52 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/zyA6GbEE7ryfnYhIndUZkP7u2jA>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis-02
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 09:19:53 -0000

Reviewer: Stefan Santesson
Review result: Ready

This document appears to be ready and well written.

>From a security point of view this document does not have much to review as
security services related to this protocol is handled by a separate document
(Security Services for the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) RFC 7481).
At a first glance the security considerations sections seems a bit limited, but
when taking RFC 7481 into account, which has already been approved as a
reasonable set of security functions for this protocol, the security
considerations section seems adequate.