Re: [Secdispatch] [dispatch] HTTP Request Signing

OK, it's on the posted agenda.

Best regards,
Kathleen

On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 2:43 PM Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:

> Given that DISPATCH meets in the first Monday morning slot, I think this
> plan makes the most sense. Justin (or the DISPATCH chairs) can give a very
> short description of the purpose of the proposed mechanism, and let
> interested parties know that the discussion will take place in SECDISPATCH.
>
> /a
>
> On 11/5/19 10:59 AM, Kathleen Moriarty wrote:
>
> We have the time at SecDispatch, so should I just add it
> considering DISPATCH has a full agenda?
>
> Best regards,
> Kathleen
>
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 11:56 AM Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu> wrote:
>
>> A number of the people involved with implementing the drafts that I’d
>> like to present are involved in IETF in different places, but none for
>> pushing this draft to date. If this work finds a home, I think we’d be able
>> to get a lot of that external community to participate in whatever list
>> ends up hosting the work.
>>
>> I’m fine with presenting at only one of DISPATCH or SECDISPATCH instead
>> of both, but since this sits squarely at the intersection of the two
>> communities it might make sense for me to just introduce the concept (~1
>> min) at whatever meeting I’m not giving a full presentation at.
>>
>>  — Justin
>>
>>
>> On Nov 4, 2019, at 3:02 PM, Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Personally, I'd rather not have the presentation twice, recognizing of
>> course, that not everyone would be able to attend one or the other. But, we
>> will have recordings and as is oft stated, ultimately decisions happen on
>> mailing lists.  And, I appreciate and agree with Jeffrey not wanting
>> feature creep in WPACK.  One objective of DISPATCH has been to ensure that
>> work that is chartered is discrete enough to finish in a timely manner.
>>
>> You mention other communities that are interested in this.  Will they be
>> participating or have they participated in IETF?    It's hard for chairs to
>> judge consensus to work on something when the communities interested in the
>> work are not participating in IETF.  Mailing list participation is
>> sufficient.
>>
>> DISPATCH agenda is pretty full right now, so this would have to fall into
>> AOB at this juncture if ADs and my WG co-chair agree that we should discuss
>> in DISPATCH.  And, perhaps whether it gets a few minutes in SECdispatch
>> might be informed on how it goes in DISPATCH, if we have a chance to
>> discuss it, since you need the agreement that this is a problem IETF should
>> solve from both areas.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mary
>> DISPATCH WG co-chair
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 5:00 PM Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> I would like to present and discuss HTTP Request signing at both the
>>> DISPATCH and SECDISPATCH meetings at IETF106 in Singapore. This I-D has
>>> been floating around for years now and has been adopted by a number of
>>> different external groups and efforts:
>>>
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cavage-http-signatures
>>>
>>> I’ve spoken with the authors of the draft and we’d like to find out how
>>> to bring this forward to publication within the IETF. I’m targeting both
>>> dispatch groups because this represents the intersection of both areas, and
>>> I think we’d get different perspectives from each side that we should
>>> consider.
>>>
>>> There have been a number of other drafts that have approached HTTP
>>> request signing as well (I’ve written two of them myself), but none has
>>> caught on to date and none have made it to RFC. Lately, though, I’ve been
>>> seeing a lot of renewed effort in different sectors, and in particular the
>>> financial sector and cloud services, to have a general purpose HTTP message
>>> signing capability. As such, I think it’s time to push something forward.
>>>
>>> I’ve reached out to the chairs for both DISPATCH and SECDISPATCH to
>>> request a presentation slot.
>>>
>>> Thank you, and I’ll see you all in Singapore!
>>>  — Justin
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dispatch mailing list
>>> dispatch@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Secdispatch mailing list
>> Secdispatch@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdispatch
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Best regards,
> Kathleen
>
> _______________________________________________
> dispatch mailing listdispatch@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch
>
>
>

-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen