Re: [Secdispatch] [Smart] New Version Notification for draft-lazanski-smart-users-internet-00.txt

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Mon, 15 July 2019 15:26 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32B312017C for <secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qmoS2deUhWid for <secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22c.google.com (mail-lj1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16C4B120193 for <Secdispatch@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id z28so16715796ljn.4 for <Secdispatch@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:26:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OWDyWD33hzbv9s0lcBRqtrRbzGS1jUX+gGSbwjHKLXc=; b=cDAXH+iKAJcPHMe8JQ/q3gDcURoEddX/yM3ci4+VOHZ5hYlVzWa7v96k1IplBXU8TD iuFeNC6bhF12frJc+m0rsYYeG5a3B0gmR+pIgnKiMElQDbtz0rFsn4RKo6lkb7/oyfKx gBDXkF8R/P5SLSqArlG20DyYn8CRIx3sgkSCjHQ0vLQRS9Y78LwRbe8HtsI9zOaqTmlx YXDuA2JmGv2rugkfTKa+QKDq7d2jRwUhi7PvqywbG8/qW2i9Nl12J6vK8/BqqYOs1vA4 9gnSeZWfk3vlnAQqRaav5uk0YOjlHXCVqeKL8FV6chlh9T7kOEgo8dwjfozKMbgCHdvC jbTA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OWDyWD33hzbv9s0lcBRqtrRbzGS1jUX+gGSbwjHKLXc=; b=bk2GyllF4ZSGwPtJNCyEpkvczCh0XtKRPS8rlr2uptXhgEmzPNceSuOZqELkvLcVg3 kU2kfNCkkLMSk6uyqsRFujVMYoNOhJp85mZfZndbNJpeNV4J/U81RouExX5B42ghr92h IQCD1ai9dFfp9DYyErWeValhHm3iv6pMEJqi3G89mQjr5sG/vcRItEqZz9cV8NN2xNW9 eeJrXfSkuEzK7bfTBypGlO4JgOFcoEiqB/6VrLmaV8Zv1q+1WHa4jTueq+oonoQNrKjL GSIGFKs1bU3uoc0axk04nGDKbqAW7JDSoiYfK3xFyNp2M9qam23kiC4TxnlLpWDIJHgw IPQQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX2Hwn5vAeTQMYPIAxJiahtmBAnOXmlMK3G11/QXncwSDINRf4l 3UQkHwfc+ZWvCTfq5fPqFnexygALfEP98kJ9Ar8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzbwgvNI1gH8/uEuYdCkB+zE3OQmp3i3fDb6n7kTwu1QzHCHRI7vpDobbW1nEEP4TwdGl1ZDllMGdSEZRqyAFo=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8892:: with SMTP id k18mr14680637lji.239.1563204385337; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <0A8948DB-F97C-4F68-9173-7E627FB5019C@lastpresslabel.com> <4B10655B-8753-4B10-ACC9-16D7F78AD9F9@gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwh3KW6ZBbMktwmLcKyY8=_ysLYJF_7MsAuiOat6baQ=Kg@mail.gmail.com> <B551EF79-7E6E-4C4E-ADCA-6538F7972222@gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwg+2RFiXK43nJv7pD3OgM8y=ziVYxBkXD3F2kJyz37SxQ@mail.gmail.com> <50E59504-CA00-4792-AA72-FC08051E2486@gmail.com> <CAHbuEH5WUv-a4nKt5YAZosO-vE773Jh3xn1+-hA=4J7RBERc3g@mail.gmail.com> <78ccb680-9ccb-f13f-0442-02833cc7cc92@cs.tcd.ie> <CABcZeBNwmitpkJn0fCbNHOJtJ25yXdk6i6U9wK0a-9hwK1Tqcw@mail.gmail.com> <D484DBE1-8136-42C6-882C-307DC48E06DE@cisco.com> <CABcZeBPrhs+UmWgEu7M8g_6j3+Yzp0+wkz0_OTtvnuUmCUFwSw@mail.gmail.com> <F17D1910-38B1-4919-8C67-E8902C155099@cisco.com> <CAHbuEH4E2Q6WhCpHvbwBqLQFFusXp0Rp6ozuaW4twN6=mBd5Hw@mail.gmail.com> <B0DB25BD-9187-410E-8561-4A35422F3591@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <B0DB25BD-9187-410E-8561-4A35422F3591@gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:25:48 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBNMtS_YqQmmEqtF-dZ-9Ys5_J_11S-qr+gP4YFp+ZcZYg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bret Jordan <jordan.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, smart@irtf.org, Dominique Lazanski <dml@lastpresslabel.com>, IETF SecDispatch <Secdispatch@ietf.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001982b2058db9e2e1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdispatch/3DPfA3UCVLJiE3RS_VURrW2IarE>
Subject: Re: [Secdispatch] [Smart] New Version Notification for draft-lazanski-smart-users-internet-00.txt
X-BeenThere: secdispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Dispatch <secdispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 15:26:30 -0000

On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 7:50 AM Bret Jordan <jordan.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Kathleen,
>
>
> I do think there is work for the IRTF as well and would like to see that
> encouraged.  The shift to strong encryption is good, but upends the current
> security management models for many.
>
>
> This is one of the points I made during my talk at RSA.  These
> technologies by themselves, are all really great.  The problem comes is
> when you start using all of them together.  To the naive comment earlier
> that this is about vendors trying to sell product, no, this is about
> network and cyber defenders and SoC analysts trying to do their job. There
> are things like regulatory compliance that organizations and enterprises
> are required to follow. Some times I feel like we are so worried about one
> piece of the security pie, that we completely neglect the others.
>

Bret,

As I said before, this is extremely general and hard to act on.

What would be most helpful at this point would be for you to describe a few
ways in which you think the IETF should have designed protocols
differently, so that we can discuss them.

-Ekr


> Here in the IETF everyone needs to better understand how SoC analysts and
> network/cyber defenders do their jobs, what they are asked to do, and what
> tools are available to them.
>
> Bret
>