Re: [Secdispatch] Request for secdispatch time slot in Vancouver IETF: Client-Cert HTTP Header

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Mon, 30 March 2020 18:17 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 219653A0D93; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 11:17:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9u6i_RUom9_L; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 11:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD8593A0D8E; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 11:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122332.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 02UIE23a005479; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 19:16:18 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=/Y+jVDae3G1+SyVTwv3E0no2LXrq2BhyaDxj04QEedU=; b=ncvY+uiYWTc/5vEJrA/Z2O1Bdh0hVKfIXHcJRyXpIjAW2ADnQ0NhGBKooOVjDsY3/7gg PfTV3p6bphEjNo+6dxQOr4cMH7psx0UZMWew9J0dLcaMjfkXtJU257f9h5rDieS8cBrM /0kqE8BpLtgAarwFJ5vpwqynPNgDrn/tSeQ0TP3PjSYLWaW5n6/nIvI6sunGCxCnReJ8 DKlHtz1X5WIhEaHQ6BiExZwgfssdCTAhTz2SVtf3lPUWx0gx1kiWs2PKP/E67Dz8zlUm AgeQ2cHhDqRF36siRit7hDQ638XrqMnvGxwW34WKKxxKdmxDJC8alnVe0QGIkiJibqCr 7w==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint7 (prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com [96.6.114.121] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 301ygp9g1e-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 30 Mar 2020 19:16:18 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 02UHli8g007198; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 14:16:17 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.118]) by prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com with ESMTP id 3028d8f4na-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 30 Mar 2020 14:16:17 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.121) by ustx2ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.123) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 13:16:16 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.121]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.121]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 13:16:11 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
CC: IETF SecDispatch <secdispatch@ietf.org>, "secdispatch-chairs@ietf.org" <secdispatch-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Secdispatch] Request for secdispatch time slot in Vancouver IETF: Client-Cert HTTP Header
Thread-Index: AQHWBFxLVTcxakOIMk25J8Uizezb5ahhvuSAgAAJuYD//74HgA==
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 18:16:11 +0000
Message-ID: <7FE4FEF8-AA30-44D8-BED8-2578B307FCD4@akamai.com>
References: <CA+k3eCTPisEFnxecjzpNAssSbTuUbUxQ+Hm+m+sjq__2Cpy9pg@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPJO4j0KZk=zjopN2oEWLN-NrYRtKO=GuQ2e5CzH7=iPA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+k3eCQ9hd6rOkxLjS3hACMT3=eC+ojq3DS_XgkcRHRrJc7xdA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBNroHGFdRXJE1X3PxF__SNeH_X3FAjJDVRgCTwGaORDLg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBNroHGFdRXJE1X3PxF__SNeH_X3FAjJDVRgCTwGaORDLg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.35.20030802
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.118.63]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7FE4FEF8AA3044D8BED82578B307FCD4akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-03-30_07:2020-03-30, 2020-03-30 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2002250000 definitions=main-2003300155
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-03-30_07:2020-03-30, 2020-03-30 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=999 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2003300155
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdispatch/4Fy0N970QnFWb1s6pDalC-vy4zY>
Subject: Re: [Secdispatch] Request for secdispatch time slot in Vancouver IETF: Client-Cert HTTP Header
X-BeenThere: secdispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Dispatch <secdispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 18:17:20 -0000

I support this document. A standardized place for a TLS-terminating intermediary to present the certificate to an origin is a good thing.  It will make CDN customers more portable.

Maybe this is a point solution that most of the Internet doesn’t care about.  But measurable portion should care and would benefit.