Re: [Secdispatch] Call for agenda items for SecDispatch at IETF 101

[Fernando Gont <[e-mail]>]

Hello, Roman,

> Hello!
> 
> SecDispatch has been tentatively scheduled at IETF 101 on Tuesday
> (March 20) at 0930-1200.  If you would like time on the agenda, send
> your request to the mailing list.  Helpful items to include in your
> request (if known/applicable) are:
> 
> ** pointers to a draft(s)/document ** pointers to related background
> or prior discussion ** desired next steps
> 
> If needed, precedence will be given to documents that have
> demonstrated interest in the form of active drafts and list
> discussion.

I'd like to request time on the agenda.

* Title: "Security and Privacy Implications of Numeric Identifiers
Employed in Network Protocols"

* Filename: draft-gont-predictable-numeric-ids-02

* Presenter: Fernando Gont <[e-mail]>

* Desired next steps:
 + Decide whether to pursue as single document, or to split the document
into separate smaller documents
 + Adopt as wg item

* Background/previous discussion:

This I-D was originally discussed on the SAAG list, and presented at the
SAAG meeting in Buenos Aires
(<https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/minutes/minutes-95-saag>). It
seemed that folks agreed that the I-D had valuable information. There
also seemed to be agreement to split the document in smaller bits,
roughly as follows:

   + Sample timeline of flawed IDs

https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gont-numeric-ids-history-03.txt

   + Advice on numeric ID generation

https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gont-numeric-ids-generation-02.txt

   + Update to RFC3552

https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-02.txt


At the time, the update to RFC3552 was put on hold because of the
rfc3552bis effort which was later aborted
(<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/4vf5RtHjliFs7dgsG8MKmhmgOi8>).

Thanks!

Best regards,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: [e-mail]
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492