Re: [Secdispatch] [Iot-onboarding] DANE IOT proposed outcome

Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com> Mon, 16 November 2020 15:31 UTC

Return-Path: <shuque@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA1B33A11C4; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 07:31:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hp4-yApY1zZO; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 07:31:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com (mail-ed1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 907253A11AC; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 07:31:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id q16so3944679edv.10; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 07:31:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7rXSr7XAsPXxLmXVmnE99hMLs7nWgrQdikmqG+FIuUA=; b=htmHvn2AqrCwPXCiXU47FxwAu7Zs2ERYgaM3TDfMr21kLvdhJ75MPmmXvlFYew66pT L09aTAMf1IRfWtR+8mBtywaBwMlJogc7nywO4NO/L9WgtzLcFjKSKmxXoJ0eY45DbxNa Rkj4alrqb54nxYtqJjY4iJL6kB7ioIfMOZE0F1otUdrxzTrtJ2u9SKo9wiSywKxjjB2v icm+0U5l6mxz5n/Fq5NCjMkKnERsZx48aTEfNo7wUsRQVyi5Ttmz3AaHc0Z5Q3k1Yc7F yDEgSnl79cja+udRqiIunnwsVkBO4x61fQI3cPY/MJTjrSPitkxquY06xY+O1h7FiQ02 XP8g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7rXSr7XAsPXxLmXVmnE99hMLs7nWgrQdikmqG+FIuUA=; b=Lt6CJ7wB6FKFD7oXPtvVrmN8sgLfbQ2/7ctSz+zPHVWWZpFBErMLjn757+CvFI5+Pq c/UeuLCQBpWyFrz33jZR9KHfVSKINC7UdAs9ziJKGGc//RrUIAJvvK4QsrigHZTgjIVd VUDFVSvZU9fHpr/xteJ+YWKmLTL3RLoleueQ4BB1u6AG7RrQdecOjvd+ILwupwym6ILs rDQ9ICLclkX0esYUWB3KbUQtb2OXd6ZKNtQN7y9h9q74bHweOeJIsuuA5FOrmemlLRBB YcXxtWXYXp0VJa/+26jklQDITeDuTKWC9B4em87uCKFekPzpoMCJfQtgwS58BtqdwFsW aEqg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531h4kcunhEH91DLMscUE5xMKoEjtTiJ0hY7OEjDMG/XiWWK6WZ2 IplXnfoJAd6/iVMq1WHK8V6MbYLUT1hTqwZNKflq/WxG5KI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx5HzOxVseKaNNNsvFY5tQBopdijcoOWZm8hfoPfXea09+0i3gi62gHOLJhVS0EOGrnIUYQiSoL0h352vnMJzg=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d48d:: with SMTP id b13mr15770158edr.264.1605540701958; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 07:31:41 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <2786E31F-2A4F-4901-8ECC-7AEF4B4D81E2@cisco.com> <b178d5066d6b4371a59ffe59bb6d6447@huawei.com> <A8214369-216E-440B-8757-172416CDF02B@cisco.com> <20201116144715.GL39343@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <5d902684f6a940448ca986d0466bc941@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <5d902684f6a940448ca986d0466bc941@huawei.com>
From: Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:31:30 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHPuVdX2sOALhKmEmbAgwS12=BmSmNMwqF0VGYHtXwgXH=TouQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Panwei (William)" <william.panwei@huawei.com>
Cc: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, "iot-onboarding@ietf.org" <iot-onboarding@ietf.org>, "secdispatch@ietf.org" <secdispatch@ietf.org>, Eliot Lear <lear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003674c905b43b1348"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdispatch/QA9xBZEYCSjWEBY3lZ2gRtJyzbg>
Subject: Re: [Secdispatch] [Iot-onboarding] DANE IOT proposed outcome
X-BeenThere: secdispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Dispatch <secdispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 15:31:52 -0000

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 10:17 AM Panwei (William) <william.panwei@huawei.com>
wrote:

> Hi Toerless,
>
> You're right, there're many ways to identify the device. But In the DANE
> client authentication case, the device's identity can only be the
> certificate or a public key pair, I think, because the DNS Server needs to
> store the public key hash values.
>

Correct. DANE records store X.509 certificates, their public key
components, or raw public keys -- most commonly hashes of them, but can
store the full certificate/key too.

Shumon.