IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Secdispatch] Clarification Question for the Comment from Eric Rescorla (

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 20 November 2019 07:34 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0C31209AF for <secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:34:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wrkvEwvnYOuA for <secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:34:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23D731209B8 for <secdispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:34:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050096.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id xAK7Tc13000580; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 07:33:57 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=WmniXZMSQY9mfcMz6jBgiGWOmcEv3vDtKEF87s98Al8=; b=fJ1xYpQZKTCJ33MQLiJ0nOZKe1CUqgQT5Czrl3+P9SD/dxrp6TGvY4BW1+4FCJ3tQeFw yYtZfMXSqPnCOcyHK1dn+6UsZOlbvmhtiy25drAhh2QfkM18knvAY2HdiLFW5+eu/n/M QJXiiuR5uxs3hlwdTJoXDe7yDGQaFz3sfrClIhJ2m6Bq0PsUxRlner4GVr2ckkdVaQRU H4vHr5EogQOZ717r8lS42w37tg3gR3ttpUiD7QRxW9B4FkkJggmVuX9wCV26e6yTbq+6 9asgyZEN1Oy2Y1vEd/rtImWKDSB65kol67OMtiz3Y+h3JSkJljhcH0N+k9Zz/L+CIQEC Ag==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint6 (prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com [184.51.33.61] (may be forged)) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2wagp8988n-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 20 Nov 2019 07:33:57 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xAK7WIOr021134; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 02:33:56 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.32]) by prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2wadaxp8ws-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 20 Nov 2019 02:33:56 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 02:33:55 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 02:33:55 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, "Dr. Pala" <madwolf@openca.org>
CC: IETF SecDispatch <secdispatch@ietf.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Thread-Topic: [Secdispatch] Clarification Question for the Comment from Eric Rescorla (
Thread-Index: AQHVnuRl9glb3sIxbE6JXWJaNFmyNqeTXCQAgAA+3QCAAGGHAIAAAe4AgACHZQA=
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 07:33:55 +0000
Message-ID: <95B2FAB7-66FA-44F2-84F8-FA23737AA38F@akamai.com>
References: <12eed4ff-edd2-7f70-9460-fc86dcbab927@openca.org> <CABcZeBPbAgBfC6Et+OKQi2=GwsyeyKEKfW5GG=StUepQwy+f0g@mail.gmail.com> <7999ebac-c9c1-eb4f-d9f7-2ba814a3b331@cs.tcd.ie> <78997490-c5ae-c856-6e26-0f79c7733ca3@openca.org> <CABcZeBM5WgpcBP4axBvzWaxKU=JA-K-4qiVxhhO1+HzFf246aw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBM5WgpcBP4axBvzWaxKU=JA-K-4qiVxhhO1+HzFf246aw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1f.0.191110
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.219.184]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_95B2FAB766FA44F284F8FA23737AA38Fakamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-11-20_01:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=882 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1911140001 definitions=main-1911200068
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,18.0.572 definitions=2019-11-20_01:2019-11-15,2019-11-20 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=857 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1011 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-1911200067
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdispatch/Qf5i7RNbPRx_5sN6gJCJrxy2BUU>
Subject: Re: [Secdispatch] Clarification Question for the Comment from Eric Rescorla (
X-BeenThere: secdispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Dispatch <secdispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 07:34:09 -0000

  *   What I was trying to say in the meeting is that I don't think this is probably to be of much use in the WebPKI at this time.

I agree with that.

But of course that’s not a “veto” on doing this work, which OF COURSE you are not saying.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email