Re: [Secdispatch] GNS at dinrg

[Melinda Shore <[e-mail]>]

On 7/31/20 8:31 AM, Schanzenbach, Martin wrote:
> I hope I understand all of your points. The way I read the charter
> of DINRG correctly, our draft would fit into the goals and
> objectives of this WG, right? 

Well, maybe.  I'm not really sure what your goals are
for the document.  If it's to standardize a protocol, dinrg
is definitely not the right place.  If it's to refine
the document, contribute to the research community, and
find collaborators, sure, but that needn't entail draft
adoption, or even publication as an internet draft.  Note
that it's actually possible to do both, although it's rare
in practice (HIP had a research group for a few years, as
one example).  Also note that while CFRG occasionally
publishes standards, I think it's alone in that among IRTF
research groups, and is something of a (much-loved)
aberration.

Melinda

-- 
Melinda Shore
[e-mail]

Software longa, hardware brevis