[Secdispatch] Re: Request for Review and Adoption of Internet Draft: High Assurance DIDs with DNS

[Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <[e-mail]>]

Thanks Jacques!
We will add it to the list of topics to discuss.
Will you be attending in person or remote?

Regards,
 Rifaat


On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 8:57 AM Jacques Latour <Jacques.Latour=
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> ACME recommended this should be sent here for considerations.
>
>
>
> Looking forward to see what you think and where home is 😉.
>
>
>
> Jacques
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Jacques Latour <[e-mail]>
> *Sent:* August 28, 2024 4:30 PM
> *To:* [e-mail]
> *Cc:* Jacques Latour <[e-mail]>; Jesse Carter <
> [e-mail]>; Mathieu Glaude <[e-mail]>; Tim
> Bouma <[e-mail]>
> *Subject:* Request for Review and Adoption of Internet Draft: High
> Assurance DIDs with DNS
>
>
>
> Hi all!
>
>
>
> First time asking for an internet draft adoption.
>
>
>
> ·
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carter-high-assurance-dids-with-dns/
>
>
>
> As one of the authors of the internet draft titled "High Assurance DIDs
> with DNS" (draft-carter-high-assurance-dids-with-dns), I am writing to
> request the ACME Working Group to review and consider adopting this draft
> as part of your working group.
>
>
> The draft proposes a method for integrating high assurance Decentralized
> Identifiers (DIDs) with the Domain Name System (DNS), aiming to enhance the
> security and reliability of DIDs by leveraging the established trust
> infrastructure of DNS. We believe that this integration aligns well with
> the goals and expertise of the ACME Working Group, particularly in the
> areas of secure and automated certificate management.
>
> We would greatly appreciate the opportunity to present this draft to the
> working group and discuss its potential benefits and implementation
> details. Your feedback and guidance would be invaluable in refining the
> draft and ensuring its alignment with the broader objectives of the IETF.
>
> Please let us know if there are any specific procedures or additional
> information required for this request. We are eager to collaborate with the
> ACME Working Group and contribute to the advancement of secure and reliable
> internet standards.
>
> In terms of support and reference for this draft, we have the following
> references that may help justify our ask.
>
>
>
> ·
> https://dhs-svip.github.io/requirements-for-decentralized-identity/TrustArchitecture/
>
> ·         DID Specification Registries (w3c.github.io)
> <https://w3c.github.io/did-spec-registries/#dnsvalidationdomain>
>
> ·         Trust DID Web - The did:tdw DID Method (bcgov.github.io)
> <https://bcgov.github.io/trustdidweb/>
>
>
>
> Example DNS implementation:
>
>
>
> $ dig _did.trustroot.ca uri +dnssec +multi
>
>
>
> _did.trustroot.ca.      3518 IN URI 0 0 "did:web:trustroot.ca"
>
> _did.trustroot.ca.      3518 IN RRSIG URI 13 3 3600 (
>
>                                 20240905000000 20240815000000 17999
> trustroot.ca.
>
>
> 4CJsquY7BEcA2YX1iWHIKzXx4lEvWa7k8JWNbp4zu3dp
>
>
> KQXdwZ73geTKgzfNz9g5+HyckxTyNyz8LU8lA+G4lg== )
>
>
>
> $ dig _did.trustroot.ca tlsa +dnssec +multi
>
>
>
> _did.trustroot.ca.      3527 IN TLSA 3 1 1 (
>
>
> CEEAD59AAE176DDD8889DF0B02083CB393D07655CBA9
>
>                                 D668EA334ABDBDB72A39 )
>
> _did.trustroot.ca.      3527 IN TLSA 3 1 0 (
>
>
> 302A300506032B6570032100C300A443F0427440AC90
>
>
> BDA85B4F97896879564A7AB649B976FA7D15FEAFC225 )
>
> _did.trustroot.ca.      3527 IN RRSIG TLSA 13 3 3600 (
>
>                                 20240905000000 20240815000000 17999
> trustroot.ca.
>
>
> z/E+jECtQzNi0zcBcrVa8P8UKiHx5SHcSEmN2vR6Oe4t
>
>
> nfvjso/8/ZXo/IlWtoqgIYrCeJJ9NLFTu/q0cGwUIg== )
>
>
>
> Thank you for your time and consideration.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jacques, Jesse, Mathieu and Tim.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> CLASSIFICATION:CONFIDENTIAL
> _______________________________________________
> Secdispatch mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>