IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Secdispatch] Re: ALFA 2.0 WG for IETF 121

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 04 October 2024 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77830C14CF18 for <secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Oct 2024 08:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nCEqsw39T54V for <secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Oct 2024 08:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1ABB0C15106B for <secdispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Oct 2024 08:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2982E1800D; Fri, 4 Oct 2024 11:08:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with LMTP id rAd1BqBrlN3M; Fri, 4 Oct 2024 11:08:51 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1728054531; bh=4gR97wTOHIAHQJgfqDwyO7deujg9nMpyWCNgqRYpIYs=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=iT4xD+O5zY6pAxzZQNtixv1XqWlomYO+7cvGR74CWvPoBQJYDSInTYpGR8UmMhuaJ jh9odTzyDLMeEsfJBY3Zik0ZnfECfwg6/jTT+Fh1O8QgXBhY4NRrcR9Z5zCtqLe/Yu UheWjq6QgQc7kzquhM7vuhABCIXa4LZEJgDkcbVqw1vKP5L2uQJ6p+Vnn/U3gOOonv uknioto/T9i1OQV18T5e4rlVa5G+j4mOa1Xkmm5GhdT4G5v0KXBsQmzeRpH9yqasZ7 DIubOS5R8lfBSxP4NGe0Z+Aem2wrNdKavfwJz4GZnCGr4NWA+pUTjAIaIwCEv6MvI/ yuwKgjI0ZIu5Q==
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3FE71800C; Fri, 4 Oct 2024 11:08:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF47511E; Fri, 4 Oct 2024 11:08:51 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: David Brossard <david.brossard@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJO7GQ-V4hS887s4d9rhgMG12WAAybCuJ=7Rf+oAFBvpDUCAHA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJO7GQ-V4hS887s4d9rhgMG12WAAybCuJ=7Rf+oAFBvpDUCAHA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8+dev; GNU Emacs 28.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0;<'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2024 11:08:51 -0400
Message-ID: <29400.1728054531@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Message-ID-Hash: UNXF26WVRAA7H4KB6P7KSDDAMSUJPTLD
X-Message-ID-Hash: UNXF26WVRAA7H4KB6P7KSDDAMSUJPTLD
X-MailFrom: mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-secdispatch.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Andrew Clymer <andy@rocksolidknowledge.com>, Theo Dimitrakos <theo.dimitrakos@ifiptm.org>, theo.dimitrakos@huawei.com, secdispatch@ietf.org, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com>, paul.wouters@aiven.io, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc5
Precedence: list
Subject: [Secdispatch] Re: ALFA 2.0 WG for IETF 121
List-Id: Security Dispatch <secdispatch.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdispatch/YCrJDx367ncXvTF77RtmhuRQzqs>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdispatch>
List-Help: <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:secdispatch-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:secdispatch@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:secdispatch-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:secdispatch-leave@ietf.org>

David Brossard <david.brossard@gmail.com> wrote:
    > With IETF 120 in the back, I wanted to circle back and talk about next
    > steps. After the lightning talk, a few folks came up to me to talk about
    > their needs for an authorization policy language. In OAuth, there is
    > also a

okay.

    > The current stub of a draft is here: https://datatracker.ietf
    > .org/doc/draft-brossard-alfa-authz/ . I have also CCed my two co-authors,
    > Andy Clymer from Rock Solid Knowledge (UK) and Theo Dimitrakos (IFIPTM, UK
    > and Huawei, Germany) who should be able to attend IETF 121 in Dublin.

I haven't read this, and I wasn't in the session.
Can you contrast it to KeyNote?
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc2704/


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status