IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Secdispatch] Can Composite sigs move back to LAMPS?

"Valery Smyslov" <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 17 January 2020 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9033120074 for <secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 10:33:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LSsHHkFwl7Ct for <secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 10:33:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E494120025 for <secdispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 10:33:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id m26so27389387ljc.13 for <secdispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 10:33:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=0BRqOzN+4Hik3rkOnkLaP2hJjqB+B/V1X4PQPN8Jo+A=; b=Cfat5wNfJKH2OSYsfDehzacw3qOToNTQBHVueQFmBlvJNl2NY/RMADFaMDdHcRCZ3a oJGef1Ei9/SD1ozpM2zUxwWdhcoYndOdQav5V2NVIFx3RIjzlwMw9JukNoeprg5fNoix iFDJfpVojhk+Q50irtuYBoai8cI3ckqRvLTnXhW+91fSlt5ASITgSXvKDUfQAOz7v1MP OWHrZaTjTVZnWFU/8JvQ+1Y/dAl9CtZwPELE4VIb+WjGgcQJcnS4+HsyKDJkdtkWD2m+ JO/XN4zIGr8tD7i6cS+y3zLBVENUJU7hau8iYkL/XlgyRXBOI+3eW3ysBL1RNhWe4mTC OzUA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=0BRqOzN+4Hik3rkOnkLaP2hJjqB+B/V1X4PQPN8Jo+A=; b=rIRh9ilBKSjoFDV/omlJs/2e1VplmLZxqWbKNfoUqY7XAfWbqwLAUb3boc9w4155S3 quJLNyXsmnuE0R3dEsRPTRb5a6f31LfTRv8PPAG+b52adYYVVCx3pFHbLsb1Vh6KV2EK BzOngYWWmOrrha2TQmOdwFWUH3A0oQMkBMU+wqsV7qd0G0uLFR5me96C46UHRLJCJXws Mn/SH6PJ/c9J72C9+sGbU5jKPiPXetlfqwoHDqN35TgrX5L1zNK4rgIWIRxFArqHElTq UCG3enPer+6Gh0JbefOjLtHq4p8OpuULq3Pixd20sPQlUIi4sc40s8xtmKO+2kE3ryw0 UE7Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW7TyW6MQ4XZDuwafs1N/yxLZq6FtgFv/F7ZZqad9FP5zSxMRzR ItfeU/s1a0RV5h9al3nTafk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxEuMSc21YJrSUympLlOT8AJLKl8Zyu0sufGCgIDLNBZMp6mQFivb5d+HytCpTU30EwXg5jIA==
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:818e:: with SMTP id e14mr6379587ljg.2.1579285982471; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 10:33:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chichi (95-27-147-103.broadband.corbina.ru. [95.27.147.103]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c189sm12565402lfg.75.2020.01.17.10.33.01 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 17 Jan 2020 10:33:01 -0800 (PST)
From: Valery Smyslov <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com>
To: 'Stephen Farrell' <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "'Markku-Juhani O. Saarinen'" <mjos@pqshield.com>
Cc: 'Daniel Van Geest' <Daniel.VanGeest@isara.com>, 'IETF SecDispatch' <secdispatch@ietf.org>, 'Mike Ounsworth' <Mike.Ounsworth@entrustdatacard.com>
References: <DM6PR11MB388377406A1AAEDCA397749C9B360@DM6PR11MB3883.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <70b221bb-bc39-52cc-f9e0-a84261afe473@cs.tcd.ie> <09B0CA53-BAAF-4139-8179-2A70ADE58632@isara.com> <c0f620d7-4e22-18a5-c168-f66b737cae86@cs.tcd.ie> <CAPwdP4PG3i5-_BuVMdH0iMcJCT40xejoM=J3dH=pPO61T-F4Aw@mail.gmail.com> <3f9de00e-85ad-48ed-ba97-e1b5418e3867@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <3f9de00e-85ad-48ed-ba97-e1b5418e3867@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 21:32:57 +0300
Message-ID: <006401d5cd64$8a871570$9f954050$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQKORapB8Wx4IiRlWtp9XVJpPbCs2ADqO76pAmH4y4wCLkqvBwI2wqzjAjhBkSumLux6EA==
Content-Language: ru
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdispatch/bWiTaSXagWT2OaCGaOQEfsYijSE>
Subject: Re: [Secdispatch] Can Composite sigs move back to LAMPS?
X-BeenThere: secdispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Dispatch <secdispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 18:33:10 -0000

Hi Stephen,

> > My conclusion is that this stuff could only really be useful
> >> enough to justify the costs if we have PQ signature schemes that are
> >> considered stable enough to deploy but where we don't yet fully trust
> >> the algorithms to the point where we'd be happy to depend solely on
> >> those new algorithms.
> >
> >
> > Thanks for your support. That is exactly where we are
> 
> I hope it's clear I disagree with you - IMO the conditions above are not
> satisfied today and I do not support adopting such work at this time. Were I
> to guess and be optimistic it might be worth re-considering the topic in a
> year or so.

Given the usual IETF performance, a year is a term just to launch a real work
and realize where to go. So, I think we should start doing it now to have
plenty of time and not to be in a hurry later.

Regards,
Valery.

> S.
> 
> > and what the stated
> > purpose of draft-ounsworth-pq-composite-sigs-02 is.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > - markku
> >
> > Dr. Markku-Juhani O. Saarinen <mjos@pqshield.com> PQShield, Oxford
> UK.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Secdispatch mailing list
> > Secdispatch@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdispatch
> >

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email