Re: [Secdispatch] Leadership changes in SecDispatch

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Fri, 28 October 2022 02:08 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C23A7C152579 for <secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 19:08:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=lopTw6FY; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=asP+bV7v
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4e_FV8aimMUk for <secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 19:08:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74808C14CE33 for <secdispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 19:08:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6539C5C00DA; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 22:08:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap41 ([10.202.2.91]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 27 Oct 2022 22:08:05 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1666922885; x=1667009285; bh=odg6oZMFld Rj0PvoTVUJd6r0xum0wgG6aODS7HlTWFQ=; b=lopTw6FY2SDTqH4JD8aFq8Wa+M i6Kg16ovn1D6mGF1kJCc5U6JqbyWkOrdOxYqRMP93/Vtg3PvupBzDrQqMfsih9mf C38O8zt3vnBIpskoZ7UHFXzOjwNY5BA/slvkAM1A0pr751Ka6RqMMvSCkhmpY2fJ qD9Ywg9mh8tBUI+zgUsq4LYzaQ2fhwaLElgXeKpEBteOlqWgRRWI7tlZE0ApNs8o DIIfiWRzELlihls4oDrJS7UxmOW7cT7VABrIZRGsoDkr0Krrmn53cDjVrciestzd 3L+mjWpgZ093jrwzNKeRm+b4GOHBrXQXy5kGun62zh2YHTLazqblNSgo2IGg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; t=1666922885; x=1667009285; bh=odg6oZMFldRj0PvoTVUJd6r0xum0 wgG6aODS7HlTWFQ=; b=asP+bV7v8BzIFGsKPAq8iWyseZGmhgqMmtHJtzNYapO0 RsiM3DRqFIFnp05Iw8QdtxMo537Cz0hFVzk6lTmMip7tz6U/Z9EvbdJgA+doqVTo 95Pj9Dv0Mxb3rgsr9xsllDzuCQh9hX8zhjUDJ2vgvWQIhxToCbDlHUFIaY5fq0Xf svxQHWlK4Sd+faSxkzbVKvM4hokrK+MKiqldbmlsAjTR4nefFij89talM7uYa/z+ UCnnSM9QNSwDV782RLGrzuFXuL0GTwVt+Qg7ar0K/9HFzX/v+2K0mUc5tVP3MEGv jb8d19A3ZQNheRCXwa0Sy+D3dpiYbVeW6OJ/GF0RhQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:hTlbY1tC8PQQSGDisZM4nYDjeb9_R3UaMa9-HmYw7EB3mYFPyiBwVQ> <xme:hTlbY-cexIOcmpH7QKSUKGnznWxaKAS6VhHS6vjofeqk8sd4nZ_Rm3apGp4UhG6ig DVkXiHQmszCb5QBUXk>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvgedrtdehgdehgecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtre dtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdforghrthhinhcuvfhhohhmshhonhdfuceomhhtsehlohif vghnthhrohhphidrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhephfeitddtveeihfejjefgve efuedugffgkeevkeehueeggeelveekveektdfhueeinecuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdr ohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpe hmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:hTlbY4wKmRQ6ich-t7-MF2IzSUozmWFf2GpSPEPRxgzM_1ZLSNYFOQ> <xmx:hTlbY8OxlqrTh981-FQrDKeNr3vNmADnZUox4CEZxGzzgmNqakgnhw> <xmx:hTlbY1-m5jtriZAMPTQKwLxfVuxpnnJ93eJa8cQueNRoRnaUiLbZUg> <xmx:hTlbY6KnoCvKiXrbJzW0zNCM2OLnMlR7LnYADYInVq6Xg1qONebElg>
Feedback-ID: ic129442d:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id DCF4E234007B; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 22:08:04 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-1087-g968661d8e1-fm-20221021.001-g968661d8
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <4810eecb-9c89-4987-b928-c24be84ce07f@betaapp.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN2P110MB11074F2446B21A40ECDBC6F5DC339@BN2P110MB1107.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <BN2P110MB11074F2446B21A40ECDBC6F5DC339@BN2P110MB1107.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 13:07:45 +1100
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, "secdispatch@ietf.org" <secdispatch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdispatch/hgoyNd_SZRQCJ_0Gojqrc0KQoTo>
Subject: Re: [Secdispatch] Leadership changes in SecDispatch
X-BeenThere: secdispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Dispatch <secdispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 02:08:10 -0000

Thanks to both Roman and Paul for formalizing what - I think - many of us have been looking for here.  This sounds like a good balance to me.

On Fri, Oct 28, 2022, at 04:39, Roman Danyliw wrote:
> Hi!
>
> SecDispatch has become an integral part of how new work is considered 
> in the SEC area.  An integral component to the success of this WG has 
> been the commendable leadership the chairs have provided to the group.
>
> A key part of that leadership team has been Mohit.  In a belated 
> official announcement, Mohit has had to step back from the co-chair 
> role due to the commitments of his new, day-job role
>
> Moving forward and considering that we are now almost five years after 
> the WG launch, Paul and I believe that for the continued health of the 
> WG an additional process refinement is necessary.  Specifically, how to 
> handle SecDispatch leadership (co-chairs) service give that this is a 
> standing WG.  With no positive action, WG chair service would be 
> indefinite.  The only transparent and resilient-to-AD-turnover way we 
> can think to handle this situation is to set in motion rough, preset 
> term length.  We've landed on a service term for up 4 years to balance 
> experience in the role and injecting new leadership into the team.  Of 
> course, circumstance might prevent a chair from spending that much time 
> in the role; or something might arise that would make the tenure a bit 
> longer.  We've also decided to slim the team down to two chairs.
>
> After coordination with the sitting chairs who endorsed this approach, 
> we will implement this process starting at IETF 115.  Bootstrapping 
> into it this will look roughly as follows:
>
> ** Prior to the IETF 115 meeting, an additional SecDispatch co-chair 
> will be named
> ** After the IETF 115, Richard will step down from the co-chair role
> ** At the IETF 117 meeting, an additional SecDispatch co-chair will be 
> named
> ** After the IETF 117 meeting, Kathleen will step down from the 
> co-chair role
> ** .. repeat ..
>
> There are many thanks to express in implementing this process.
>
> WG: It is our pleasure to announce that Rifaat Shekh-Yusef will be 
> stepping into the role of the co-chair.  Rifaat: Thank you for your 
> willingness to serve.
>
> Mohit: thank you so much for your service and being a steady hand in 
> the dispatch process.  Congratulations on your new job.  We're excited 
> for the opportunity this brings but sad that this means we'll benefit 
> less from your counsel.
>
> Richard: the WG has benefitted from your leadership since we launched 
> this new, at the time, experimental way, to consider new work.  It's 
> now foundational to our operation.  Thanks for getting us there, and 
> for your service!
>
> Kathleen and Richard: we're asking you to step down out of visible 
> leadership positions despite doing commendable work.  Thank you! 
>
> Regards,
> Roman and Paul
>
> _______________________________________________
> Secdispatch mailing list
> Secdispatch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdispatch