IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Secdispatch] EDHOC Summary

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 29 March 2019 09:10 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA63A1202C2 for <secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 02:10:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NhiSTxdG8x61 for <secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 02:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it1-x12e.google.com (mail-it1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B160E120261 for <secdispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 02:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id 139so2684763ita.4 for <secdispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 02:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bX7BjwVqlrM+2C6kuJCFRNrKGyXNvVdW83RAd1yGB6I=; b=Ij9rMPQqwPs8PvVcnhUHD4j5WyoMl5iE/EJWQtRtGdCcmqlvGl/oZ76CRP9DQee72R fHP0wbmJIvuBOUtY5DuKWifF71vUzUb6QKUvaYAHJhVbwX62/vCc+4ZjlMVHIuMCAIuG 6b8RyYtJkkUTKf+r+9D93qaZE51CneooXXkK+8e4pVDZlBnGFQSUsvNof9Z19vBRYMpG OX4fZatZDyNzvxe8amWL6fhFfQXGaBgVwvP+/bGAlDU5C4GWeHjEpWD51gkP3QzFf095 DTYn4A3dXNTt0theHa/prZPYWDab7T9CrIwwEEzJJzFwE//UY4Nf9fCjGjuk9i6pm3j9 KiIA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bX7BjwVqlrM+2C6kuJCFRNrKGyXNvVdW83RAd1yGB6I=; b=qyqVjbky2BjxVqgQnNAgSo18WPRgBM8SzJhJQoWYL+CVC+CrlLfmCI/DFU4OvfNumh sPkRiJkfMUILSgwKqxaiMKBMGtktkdoch5b/avfkHhZC/3Ywr08mPohDj1FqX/XptIv7 XubmJ4B9b1aY/Uc8KGsjqP8kiIsLH9PGRgy35Aq+SmFxieP6nsGBwX5oSMEDMO0fwk/x vZ7XqS0rcYt9+Oz0WdSBZYlPPsx5FMCZP6IWXMVwYQCy5oimos334MyEYNzITh4GYPrq gjmhNEuD7MSdQ0uligwaGFlZTpNTtSEAHVnOmKCsYt7UkA/vkAon+ue5IBF5G/hYL8zD 80vg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXUme5JSeIPYLognK7gUmdqjwXEgG7CA8N9MbCvBW/5gWbLvqMB CPd/YZvTOQW5KcJM6Tn64u03nQuGW6ejPxBsVH/C7jtO
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwjUhPqiRrxtE4BscKKkGEFYfOAd+7H7D5HYQNMwmtuO6agSGy3UQ1TuERvP9MzhmvLoPRKvlYeQGgBMZND3iQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:bb06:: with SMTP id y6mr34959075jan.98.1553850637007; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 02:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01B3311A9F@marchand> <11892ea2-740f-db69-0935-a0e92c7e60d2@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <11892ea2-740f-db69-0935-a0e92c7e60d2@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 05:10:00 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH5RcMb=ZEZNLC+Xzs1OqdcWf+32iv3xO491VeH3P-N2bA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, "secdispatch@ietf.org" <secdispatch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000040bf000585380b4f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdispatch/hhjlM2s02NUq8anKYuL0qQ1f-pE>
Subject: Re: [Secdispatch] EDHOC Summary
X-BeenThere: secdispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Dispatch <secdispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 09:10:40 -0000

On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 4:48 AM Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
wrote:

>
> Hiya,
>
> FWIW, I'm neither for nor against EDHOC, but...
>
> On 28/03/2019 10:32, Roman Danyliw wrote:
> > Chartering a narrowly scoped, short-lived WG in this space with EDHOC
> > as a starting point seems to be an attractive path forward, but we
> > would like to receive community feedback on the degree of support for
> > this approach.
>
> I'd guess that there's no chance of that short-lived bit happening
> if people are going to continue to argue for more TLS-like variants
> that do similar stuff. I've no clue if that is or is not the case.
> A similar situation added a couple of years (and some angst) to
> the lifetime of tcpinc.
>

This has already had 2 years added for that reason, so I'm for moving ahead
since there's interest from multiple parties to implement.

Best,
Kathleen

>
> Cheers,
> S.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Secdispatch mailing list
> Secdispatch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdispatch
>


-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email