Re: [Secdispatch] [core] EDHOC Summary

Hi,

I support also the creation of this WG. EDHOC is very promising for  LPWAN
networks.

Laurent

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:37 PM Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com>
wrote:

> Unsurprisingly I'm on the same page;
>
> All the best,
>
> Pascal
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: core <core-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Jari Arkko
> > Sent: mardi 2 avril 2019 11:19
> > To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>; Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
> > Cc: secdispatch@ietf.org; core <core@ietf.org>
> > Subject: Re: [core] [Secdispatch] EDHOC Summary
> >
> > FWIW, I had not had time to look at this during the IETF week, nor did I
> have
> > an opportunity to be at the CORE WG during the IETF. But I support
> Roman's
> > conclusion below:
> >
> > >> -----[ Conclusion
> > >>
> > >> There appears to be an understood and scoped problem that is feasible
> to
> > engineer.  Among the available starting points to address the problem
> defined
> > in question #1, EDHOC presents a viable choice.
> > >>
> > >> Chartering a narrowly scoped, short-lived WG in this space with EDHOC
> as a
> > starting point seems to be an attractive path forward, but we would like
> to
> > receive community feedback on the degree of support for this approach.
> >
> > Jari
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > core mailing list
> > core@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core
>
> _______________________________________________
> Secdispatch mailing list
> Secdispatch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdispatch
>