Re: [Secdispatch] [core] EDHOC Summary

Laurent Toutain <laurent.toutain@imt-atlantique.fr> Tue, 02 April 2019 13:49 UTC

Return-Path: <laurent.toutain@imt-atlantique.fr>
X-Original-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48BD6120128; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 06:49:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=imt-atlantique.fr
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aqv2REqvAt1L; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 06:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zproxy120.enst.fr (zproxy120.enst.fr [137.194.2.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06ABB12010E; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 06:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by zproxy120.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0305C81E84; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 15:49:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from zproxy120.enst.fr ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (zproxy120.enst.fr [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id nhHlUHs-GacH; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 15:49:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by zproxy120.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC4181988; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 15:49:50 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 zproxy120.enst.fr 0EC4181988
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=imt-atlantique.fr; s=50EA75E8-DE22-11E6-A6DE-0662BA474D24; t=1554212990; bh=ZwJoxeS0W3TbACQQ3xXexD3KpUZQwIQPR5tmE/H4xqU=; h=MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID:To; b=H5DQ8czAXGEi4U2UGLDDi8XQdTVvmbf7P4Ey4gkdX18Z6v83zlCSBYQOvOTt+G8lD q2LwcNlI/MjRa4AlXELLwvZM9b2ZYVCQGzHzOL93PPxngkK/R1j+Na8Kw1gMJruST4 0x9Nth9m9HjUXlOJcmBaab6TjYEAlZuAkQ2rFp7g=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zproxy120.enst.fr
Received: from zproxy120.enst.fr ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (zproxy120.enst.fr [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id uYZqZW_jIfRw; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 15:49:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-it1-f169.google.com (mail-it1-f169.google.com [209.85.166.169]) by zproxy120.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A43F81927; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 15:49:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-it1-f169.google.com with SMTP id 139so5297393ita.4; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 06:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX0oT6NzliH5DbuoDWCO0iWHUi6KCsoIEWJeV/k0UFWlhcrIN1q fxNa8iEqef1JiYQ/r4FuAvWvdauc4FcW1+7/e8s=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw9vUYH31pk22z0i3oCAf0aOUohPM0f4UgZx5/6deJS8Xeoou4GfgwTaLtwA75U1dv1sU0m69+5Bmv79yPXfB4=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:3d4a:: with SMTP id n71mr4394110itn.55.1554212987993; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 06:49:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01B3311A9F@marchand> <438BFA1F-5EA3-4B8E-A04F-EF643A8725E3@tzi.org> <721CFE5F-9E3D-4FBA-8A27-D8D975903B38@piuha.net> <MN2PR11MB3565581E434FB6295C011D4FD8560@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB3565581E434FB6295C011D4FD8560@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Laurent Toutain <laurent.toutain@imt-atlantique.fr>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 15:49:11 +0200
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CABONVQbsKZ7r5JsX80GQP=tyeZoQzoK32f6MissvMcBwJX7S-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABONVQbsKZ7r5JsX80GQP=tyeZoQzoK32f6MissvMcBwJX7S-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "secdispatch@ietf.org" <secdispatch@ietf.org>
Cc: lp-wan <lp-wan@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000e051405858c69c1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdispatch/lMykdmZSoTFrHPuiU5F1EUlb7h8>
Subject: Re: [Secdispatch] [core] EDHOC Summary
X-BeenThere: secdispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Dispatch <secdispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 13:49:56 -0000

Hi,

I support also the creation of this WG. EDHOC is very promising for  LPWAN
networks.

Laurent

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:37 PM Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com>
wrote:

> Unsurprisingly I'm on the same page;
>
> All the best,
>
> Pascal
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: core <core-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Jari Arkko
> > Sent: mardi 2 avril 2019 11:19
> > To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>rg>; Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
> > Cc: secdispatch@ietf.org; core <core@ietf.org>
> > Subject: Re: [core] [Secdispatch] EDHOC Summary
> >
> > FWIW, I had not had time to look at this during the IETF week, nor did I
> have
> > an opportunity to be at the CORE WG during the IETF. But I support
> Roman's
> > conclusion below:
> >
> > >> -----[ Conclusion
> > >>
> > >> There appears to be an understood and scoped problem that is feasible
> to
> > engineer.  Among the available starting points to address the problem
> defined
> > in question #1, EDHOC presents a viable choice.
> > >>
> > >> Chartering a narrowly scoped, short-lived WG in this space with EDHOC
> as a
> > starting point seems to be an attractive path forward, but we would like
> to
> > receive community feedback on the degree of support for this approach.
> >
> > Jari
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > core mailing list
> > core@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core
>
> _______________________________________________
> Secdispatch mailing list
> Secdispatch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdispatch
>