IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Secdispatch] Re: ALFA 2.0 WG for IETF 121

David Brossard <david.brossard@gmail.com> Fri, 04 October 2024 23:21 UTC

Return-Path: <david.brossard@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86726C1DA1DE for <secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Oct 2024 16:21:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qxFTxDHwLfeT for <secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Oct 2024 16:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42a.google.com (mail-wr1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE793C1840CB for <secdispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Oct 2024 16:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-37ccfba5df5so1819533f8f.0 for <secdispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Oct 2024 16:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1728084107; x=1728688907; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=69ckDXbpGGnyHSdr9jhn+bkH7V7TqtW5w/po451ojTk=; b=UEMzAkwf0i9d4OFldwF5o1ZwrionrSV70o1NrznQBAC7maDfMhqVZ2TJqHP5MxwGSc JiBVqWhGCYg2yFBr81Newfo9W5bU9FQT2+Q2txyyK8HuLDoFLP88HFEJO90cJyViNjPI EEMabwdOmSYDC3PofFw7vDZ7P9Q2nQiT31JUPVXn6vCU2Aos7P7zRYT7GGgyu0x7Uu6v q7kV31eh3Lh7UE71JIKfylEqzD63bg9WKQZAr9SdCmuffDIOJiJaTxF3yeWFDo5Rx9c+ 8t9Vos8GtrVuVBA2IwxPRYzK9o/nXraK6g5k6ey81i8EziY9yVsuzCSi1rw8ZoZqwl7H kNnA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1728084107; x=1728688907; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=69ckDXbpGGnyHSdr9jhn+bkH7V7TqtW5w/po451ojTk=; b=Hll8KiZYXskzxV23Zz/HV+5ypIuYFhcqesfYG++7wqat4kcKdQGavlxIzq/DFefViy T16bUq/nyBfP2Pkb6nYt5enCLbocwWyCOknoZTKmtCNQ7LICo9rGPRihISzHnf2VzJ96 w1IJ3e0vt/rBh9S64ixtzxWv0o68hFDOcm3e7xc65XwWjyRbpKo+iJtlGjqJMa7iApod HvsGESA6kUcEsef1swpZz9Va0lRybZselwwPpZejDweiln+47u6XrLMgdplC9Q7T8hWU JRA1bvVNY0joRHFObXvOMhvk+4SZdOYlmrZkrQ+NvJkZSYH1gyQT6obUsplpA5xDUGnd CY4A==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXg8xeXT9544/+le8Hu0DsX8gyuZ6v/Y6Bww1PMglmAsV3C79e7arJGVGoVs3mW1CiPAvpgWbP03dHq0g==@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzIQ+ZldAfUtKFk5spDq+du2Vgjm0DiqljY1x8488QaNMVYcPN9 CKH4u0MW/Qz5fEhR/klhjcB0gMYtKlySCB1vqPDANmTOFzsJIXjR3/9Pmi4duMLAGzLM2h/0hQR DvQxkuvEp7VSRANxP0GxtKMAi7Hw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHcMSEgfV9xy9mcyiCkX5rXszR2k2Sbb1Jbs4LoogO0iCZ+Ec9Q/oJFHrHx3FCeDMB2ccV9kAvXRf11jTrB8I8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1f8f:b0:37c:cee1:acb5 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-37d0e6bc830mr3463164f8f.7.1728084107146; Fri, 04 Oct 2024 16:21:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAJO7GQ-V4hS887s4d9rhgMG12WAAybCuJ=7Rf+oAFBvpDUCAHA@mail.gmail.com> <AEC2C0DF-33BA-4238-B792-33879BF22B2F@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <AEC2C0DF-33BA-4238-B792-33879BF22B2F@akamai.com>
From: David Brossard <david.brossard@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2024 01:21:36 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJO7GQ8CTn=YuekfYondT8kF8f-E7vV6vVw_ee_6u1=NbKL=Tw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000593e940623aeefae"
Message-ID-Hash: C56CHSYWYUIHFJKJ2KDNMNYMFSP7WVEO
X-Message-ID-Hash: C56CHSYWYUIHFJKJ2KDNMNYMFSP7WVEO
X-MailFrom: david.brossard@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-secdispatch.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Andrew Clymer <andy@rocksolidknowledge.com>, Theo Dimitrakos <theo.dimitrakos@ifiptm.org>, secdispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc5
Precedence: list
Subject: [Secdispatch] Re: ALFA 2.0 WG for IETF 121
List-Id: Security Dispatch <secdispatch.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdispatch/nHNrjWeZqXk4eYMVFfSFeTVYAHg>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdispatch>
List-Help: <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:secdispatch-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:secdispatch@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:secdispatch-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:secdispatch-leave@ietf.org>

I have been emailing dispatch but I was under the impression that 121 would
not have an all dispatch. Thanks for the pointer to the bof. Let me look
into it and get back to you.

On Fri, Oct 4, 2024, 5:14 PM Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:

> Look at https://www.ietf.org/process/bofs/
>
>
>
> If you want a dispatch group to make a recommendation for a BoF, you
> should know that as an experiment all the dispatch sessions are being
> merged for this IETF into one “alldispatch” session.  And if you want to
> present there, you should email alldispatch@ietf.org with your request
> ASAP.
>
>
>

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status