IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Secdispatch] Clarification Question for the Comment from Eric Rescorla (

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Wed, 20 November 2019 07:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5BB6120C69 for <secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:38:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EJ2alAPYFKea for <secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:38:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com (mail-lf1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A711C120AA9 for <secdispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:37:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id f16so217703lfm.3 for <secdispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:37:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=09Vra0As0AZFKeUZ/WGeTE8GLHnBuhqtgQ3iiqZProY=; b=mO8RACNH2JLdsXbwvTUXlnvJvFhFa+2qW5jjlC0CiqPhzfovJ5iGkc1A4pxc8cEWoT DHxcG9k9WkV0T0HnlTqKc9HlffodS7Q8oQI+eA3L+xTb88sog31++k/oRopWlZaMub8a A4kqmB0hphiLLByYy1htqofeuN0XjC5Hwqw6iiFs20w+Dhm1BiNQOYcbZtNVl4PVmTtg kzN9iIlefEtyggtT4n7eBLPHTz62X49J6U0MF7VVeJUO+8ZWV9b2StRbzMIocyHDrXRs 2tHwenneBwHlzJuHB8PEYJM1bGt0wixL7QrL0dFf74jDPdVUk/nmhrojIbxif5iydwz8 LGSA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=09Vra0As0AZFKeUZ/WGeTE8GLHnBuhqtgQ3iiqZProY=; b=jOEfEYF4cYIA2zIZ1Cxk0Ezxx0hcLK10RBgchTuwiM4v/hEY4y8lKBipfeuaDLMSrp 1/rhh6JOD32kTfvYGQrcvwV23tWw9UdG1hQPuj6d0cn+e+G1VFDwnPdTm/E6oeJ4w70V 7LeQ64LaTY8hznalUMaPHv7E5uzHGemZvvEsrF6651bT0vsEQ073nuDvT7hncJ9u/HDP Vi2+yF7GEQ0tdnN6VZohhTk593Ty6tPYQSyMC1Ayl5fRUHsT57b8hLOnIjmEshDY+c45 aqPALEfyMOe3yNV8LUwMxkizvD6mmnrXR897MEdMRt/QXNPmc7QtdBo+OTNMzlPtL253 ic9Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVFexabTWwXnMuqDW0cfRJtF8jgwSoCXrSSgSe4vwxFOCODRLA2 DzFN42vUJ7H33sn2MGHgkZHNsp9ZzMCrwSLARxBcR6ja
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzs3w1FvXg2CRawc5ju77je4IyAUIWltyulXnddgXkt3wuhhJa5RvowtZPFaM5ux17BCYFbFLYu0xCZQS+zhiA=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:a410:: with SMTP id q16mr1577503lfc.184.1574235472576; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:37:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <12eed4ff-edd2-7f70-9460-fc86dcbab927@openca.org> <CABcZeBPbAgBfC6Et+OKQi2=GwsyeyKEKfW5GG=StUepQwy+f0g@mail.gmail.com> <7999ebac-c9c1-eb4f-d9f7-2ba814a3b331@cs.tcd.ie> <78997490-c5ae-c856-6e26-0f79c7733ca3@openca.org> <CABcZeBM5WgpcBP4axBvzWaxKU=JA-K-4qiVxhhO1+HzFf246aw@mail.gmail.com> <95B2FAB7-66FA-44F2-84F8-FA23737AA38F@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <95B2FAB7-66FA-44F2-84F8-FA23737AA38F@akamai.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:37:16 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBM06FEiMkDVhOPnQggHCG7DeOVkNLNn1w2wDnhy6rJuhg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Cc: "Dr. Pala" <madwolf@openca.org>, IETF SecDispatch <secdispatch@ietf.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000022d5410597c242f7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdispatch/ulKrxnKu6Uw9ITAGs1F3ux3EBJ8>
Subject: Re: [Secdispatch] Clarification Question for the Comment from Eric Rescorla (
X-BeenThere: secdispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Dispatch <secdispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 07:38:08 -0000

On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 11:34 PM Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:

>
>    - What I was trying to say in the meeting is that I don't think this
>    is probably to be of much use in the WebPKI at this time.
>
>
>
> I agree with that.
>
>
>
> But of course that’s not a “veto” on doing this work, which OF COURSE you
> are not saying.
>

Agreed. I think the relevant question is if there is enough demand, so just
because WebPKI doesn't want it doesn't mean that someone doesn't.

-Ekr

_______________________________________________
> Secdispatch mailing list
> Secdispatch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdispatch
>

v2.2.1 | Report a Bug | By Email