Re: [Secdispatch] [Ace] FW: [secdir] EDHOC and Transports

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 18 February 2019 01:35 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706B5130E84; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 17:35:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N6xYzpE2Oz62; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 17:35:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85DCE130E7C; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 17:35:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:56b2:3ff:fe0b:d84]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448A0380BE; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 20:35:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id A9316D7E; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 20:35:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C57C9A; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 20:35:05 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
cc: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=B6ran_Selander?= <goran.selander@ericsson.com>, "secdispatch@ietf.org" <secdispatch@ietf.org>, "ace@ietf.org" <ace@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAL02cgQFyB4YOMr=hDdTVQ6Vc8LFo+RxVB9JA2EucdRK8_-wbA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4FA72889-F601-4255-962E-9A13E932EE21@ericsson.com> <CAL02cgTM93+ij+ottP_xR+OTvdj3S+pCKNOAAjEsj8Srt7EeYA@mail.gmail.com> <998ABFEF-7E5B-4B91-80DB-20ED43DE9A5C@ericsson.com> <CAL02cgQFyB4YOMr=hDdTVQ6Vc8LFo+RxVB9JA2EucdRK8_-wbA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 20:35:05 -0500
Message-ID: <12390.1550453705@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdispatch/vcXyATYb5fePh5Adua8hiiSprr8>
Subject: Re: [Secdispatch] [Ace] FW: [secdir] EDHOC and Transports
X-BeenThere: secdispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Dispatch <secdispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 01:35:11 -0000

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> wrote:
    > Finally, to be totally honest, I find the EDHOC spec pretty inscrutable. A
    > little more prose to explain what's going on would go a long way toward
    > helping this discussion be productive.

Sure.
Find a WG to adopt it, and we can make the text beautiful.
The packets are all there, and the references pretty much explain all the crypto.
This stuff is not any newer than IKEv2.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-