IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Secdispatch] EDHOC Summary

Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Wed, 03 April 2019 19:44 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559781205CD for <secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 12:44:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w76Pww9LK8zs for <secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 12:44:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from veto.sei.cmu.edu (veto.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 671F51205CC for <secdispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 12:44:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from delp.sei.cmu.edu (delp.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.31]) by veto.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x33JiuwS039717 for <secdispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 15:44:56 -0400
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 veto.sei.cmu.edu x33JiuwS039717
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1554320696; bh=HPZVIXmqVHC891D1Nqhq1QnbOm5Us4/mwex4nQwpYVI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=MNtBLF+bEdI8lAobI+sF4wuQbOVdBxH0Xy185fmlKCLODrtIpLqQtPK3Q4exkF0kR DJ/0BPg1SuUWhprEL2hAQBmyT0rtk9xHVp9HSwCJfziESEfDpAjzvW9RaFjH6dqtvk NhuG1iRxBQ+KYJtKYl86N3NWHA0GRlEddkTDmozc=
Received: from CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cassina.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.249]) by delp.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x33JirXJ027179 for <secdispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 15:44:53 -0400
Received: from MARCHAND.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.251]) by CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.249]) with mapi id 14.03.0435.000; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 15:44:53 -0400
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: "secdispatch@ietf.org" <secdispatch@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: EDHOC Summary
Thread-Index: AdTlTpiwSQddzTDHR8ys25qjhhiyAAFBp0NQ
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 19:44:51 +0000
Message-ID: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01B331B9CE@marchand>
References: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01B3311A9F@marchand>
In-Reply-To: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01B3311A9F@marchand>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.22.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdispatch/x-eDuCr7pDbzXSNASwlDfH4dkmI>
Subject: Re: [Secdispatch] EDHOC Summary
X-BeenThere: secdispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Dispatch <secdispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 19:44:59 -0000

Hello!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Secdispatch [mailto:secdispatch-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Roman Danyliw
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 6:32 AM
> To: secdispatch@ietf.org
> Subject: [Secdispatch] EDHOC Summary
> 
> Hi!
> 
> We have observed the continued discussion and interest in the topics
> discussed at the March 2019 Virtual Interim Secdispatch meeting [1].  Our
> assessment of the current state of this discuss and as well as proposed next
> steps are below.

[snip]

Thanks for all of the feedback so far.  We would appreciate any additional thoughts by Monday, April 15, 2019.

Regards,
Roman and Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email