Re: [SECMECH] Framework Bindings Vs. Mechanism Bridges

Josh Howlett <josh.howlett@bristol.ac.uk> Mon, 22 August 2005 13:59 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E7CpO-0006f7-Aa; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 09:59:06 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E7CpM-0006f2-Ek for secmech@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 09:59:04 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA16531 for <secmech@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 09:59:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.102]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E7DPu-0001fO-MS for secmech@ietf.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 10:36:52 -0400
Received: from isis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.63]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1E7Cp1-00002H-Jk; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:58:45 +0100
Received: from cumulus.cse.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.12.162]) by isis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1E7Cnw-0000KJ-Qd; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:57:40 +0100
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:57:35 +0100
From: Josh Howlett <josh.howlett@bristol.ac.uk>
To: Charles Clancy <clancy@cs.umd.edu>, Shumon Huque <shuque@isc.upenn.edu>
Subject: Re: [SECMECH] Framework Bindings Vs. Mechanism Bridges
Message-ID: <35850EE42DFD2824F0DDBBC8@cumulus>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.60.0508220801430.1114@ismene>
References: <7210B31550AC934A8637D6619739CE6905C06510@e2k-sea-xch2.sea-alpha. cisco.com> <Pine.GSO.4.60.0508191330380.16954@ismene> <20050819210308.GI6659@binky.Central.Sun.COM> <20050820031035.GA5352@isc.upenn.edu> <43074F76.8000604@cs.umd.edu> <20050822044255.GC27685@isc.upenn.edu> <Pine.GSO.4.60.0508220801430.1114@ismene>
Originator-Info: login-token=Mulberry:01FEGtv3a2FyVXqvMeTnWx2jJRuOEYVHlvDzFIteEWREK2GA==; token_authority=postmaster@bristol.ac.uk
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.5 (Linux/x86)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: -2.8
X-Spam-Level: --
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: secmech@ietf.org, Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>
X-BeenThere: secmech@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Josh Howlett <josh.howlett@bristol.ac.uk>
List-Id: Security mechanisms BOF <secmech.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secmech>, <mailto:secmech-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/secmech>
List-Post: <mailto:secmech@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secmech-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secmech>, <mailto:secmech-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: secmech-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Errors-To: secmech-bounces@lists.ietf.org


--On Monday, August 22, 2005 08:36:44 -0400 Charles Clancy 
<clancy@cs.umd.edu> wrote:
> Personally, I think a native EAP-Kerberos method that utilizes
> DTLS is the way to go.

Why not take something like TTLSv1 and define a Kerberos binding to it?

josh.

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------
Josh Howlett, Networking & Digital Communications,
Information Systems & Computing, University of Bristol, U.K.
'phone: 0117 928 7850 email: josh.howlett@bris.ac.uk
------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
SECMECH mailing list
SECMECH@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secmech