Re: [SECMECH] Framework Bindings Vs. Mechanism Bridges

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 25 August 2005 16:05 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E8KEi-0006oD-PK; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:05:52 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E8KEi-0006o4-08 for secmech@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:05:52 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA26300 for <secmech@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:05:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([193.234.218.130]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E8KFF-0007u7-CD for secmech@ietf.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:06:26 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0754A89852; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 19:05:35 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <430DEC5A.4000408@piuha.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 19:05:46 +0300
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>
Subject: Re: [SECMECH] Framework Bindings Vs. Mechanism Bridges
References: <5057734.1124708889160.JavaMail.servlet@kundenserver> <20050822114112.GA343@isc.upenn.edu> <430DCD75.5040601@piuha.net> <20050825155300.GA15718@binky.Central.Sun.COM>
In-Reply-To: <20050825155300.GA15718@binky.Central.Sun.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: secmech@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: secmech@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security mechanisms BOF <secmech.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secmech>, <mailto:secmech-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/secmech>
List-Post: <mailto:secmech@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secmech-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secmech>, <mailto:secmech-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: secmech-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Errors-To: secmech-bounces@lists.ietf.org

Nicolas Williams wrote:

>Fixing RFC2712 so it actually works with Kerberos V extensions (by not
>unnecessarily making up its own Authenticator and AP exchange messages)
>is eminently doable.
>
>Fixing RFC2712 to provide IAKERB-like features is another story -- TLS
>has a fixed number of round-trips!  (If you'll remember, I mentioned the
>possibility for "GSS ciphersuites for TLS" at the BoF and mentioned this
>problem as something that would have to be fixed in TLS).
>  
>
Ok. I'm starting to remember this now...

--Jari


_______________________________________________
SECMECH mailing list
SECMECH@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secmech