[SECMECH] FW: [eap] EMU BOF

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Tue, 08 November 2005 15:19 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EZVFg-00071R-VZ; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 10:19:12 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EZVFd-00071J-Js for secmech@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 10:19:11 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA11014 for <secmech@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 10:18:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([193.234.218.130]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EZVVS-0006W3-0Z for secmech@ietf.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 10:35:31 -0500
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86BFE89871; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:18:53 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <4370B34D.4010105@piuha.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 16:16:45 +0200
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Thomas Otto <t.otto@sharevolution.de>
References: <200511080910.20517.t.otto@sharevolution.de>
In-Reply-To: <200511080910.20517.t.otto@sharevolution.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cab78e1e39c4b328567edb48482b6a69
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: secmech@ietf.org
Subject: [SECMECH] FW: [eap] EMU BOF
X-BeenThere: secmech@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security mechanisms BOF <secmech.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secmech>, <mailto:secmech-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/secmech>
List-Post: <mailto:secmech@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secmech-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secmech>, <mailto:secmech-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: secmech-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Errors-To: secmech-bounces@lists.ietf.org

Thomas Otto wrote:

>Hi all!
>
>Regarding the EMU BOF on Thursday. 
>
>It is widely accepted that there is need for more standardized EAP 
>methods. Also for an pre-shared key based method.
>
>Florent Bersani has done a lot of work in this direction, and although 
>this has been in early 2004, the analysis is still up-to-date.
>
>The respective I-Ds are  
>
>1) draft-bersani-eap-synthesis-sharedkeymethods-00.txt 
>e.g. available here:
>http://ietfreport.isoc.org/idref/draft-bersani-eap-synthesis-sharedkeymethods/
>
>2) draft-bersani-eap-sharedkeymethods-doctemplate-00.txt
>e.g. available here:
>ietfreport.isoc.org/idref/draft-bersani-eap-sharedkeymethods-doctemplate/
>
>A second note. Although we agree that a pre-shared key EAP method must
>be standardized, it is to discuss which features this method has to offer.
>
>I have collected my thoughts on this issue and put them into slides,
>available here
>http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013790/IETF64-EMU-PresharedKeyMethods.pdf
>and the source
>http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013790/IETF64-EMU-PresharedKeyMethods.ppt
>
>Probably they motivate a discussion at the EMU BOF. 
>
>Thomas
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>eap mailing list
>eap@lists.frascone.com
>http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap
>
>
>  
>


_______________________________________________
SECMECH mailing list
SECMECH@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secmech