[SECMECH] Is this list still useful?
Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Mon, 27 August 2007 14:38 UTC
Return-path: <secmech-bounces@lists.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IPfjp-0000Rn-Kl; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:38:45 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IPfjo-0000QI-Ms for secmech@ietf.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:38:44 -0400
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org ([69.25.196.178]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IPfji-0002PA-Ne for secmech@ietf.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:38:44 -0400
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 0735148C3; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:38:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: secmech@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:38:18 -0400
Message-ID: <tslbqct82lh.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8ac499381112328dd60aea5b1ff596ea
Cc:
Subject: [SECMECH] Is this list still useful?
X-BeenThere: secmech@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security mechanisms BOF <secmech.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secmech>, <mailto:secmech-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/secmech>
List-Post: <mailto:secmech@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secmech-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secmech>, <mailto:secmech-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: secmech-bounces@lists.ietf.org
It's collecting a lot of spam in the moderation queue and it is not clear that is useful. Unless people object I plan to close it down. _______________________________________________ SECMECH mailing list SECMECH@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secmech
- [SECMECH] Is this list still useful? Sam Hartman
- RE: [SECMECH] Is this list still useful? Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)