[Secret] John Scudder's No Objection on charter-ietf-tigress-00-03: (with COMMENT)

John Scudder via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 30 June 2022 01:06 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: John Scudder via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: tigress-chairs@ietf.org, secret@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
Message-ID: <165655117426.26132.17929474703754734067@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 18:06:14 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secret/-PERANFe7oGZuIO2HwfbCsvAf_A>
Subject: [Secret] John Scudder's No Objection on charter-ietf-tigress-00-03: (with COMMENT)

John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-tigress-00-03: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-tigress/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with Murray's comment that the second paragraph makes it appear a whole
lot like the solution is already decided, now all we have to do is figure out
how to back into it. :-(

Other than that, my only other comment is that this is the only time I've ever
seen an IETF charter feel the need to disclaim device UI considerations. Surely
that goes without saying?

[Secret] John Scudder's No Objection on charter-i… John Scudder via Datatracker