[Secret] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on charter-ietf-tigress-00-01: (with COMMENT)
Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 28 June 2022 19:51 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secret@ietf.org
Delivered-To: secret@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695B1C14792F; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 12:51:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: tigress-chairs@ietf.org, secret@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 8.5.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <165644589641.27894.7585176443533912652@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 12:51:36 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secret/J1H9m4MCtj5iGY1hLMuvf5Smqmg>
Subject: [Secret] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on charter-ietf-tigress-00-01: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: secret@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Secure Credential Transfer <secret.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secret>, <mailto:secret-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secret/>
List-Post: <mailto:secret@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secret-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secret>, <mailto:secret-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 19:51:36 -0000
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-tigress-00-01: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-tigress/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The second paragraph reads like a bunch of decisions have already been made. I suggest this should be rewritten to specify requirements (if that's appropriate at this stage) rather than enumerating things that appear to be properties of an already preferred solution.
- [Secret] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on chart… Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
- Re: [Secret] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on c… Roman Danyliw