Re: [Curdle] eddsa25519 & eddsa448 for use with SSH

Ben Harris <bjh21@bjh21.me.uk> Fri, 05 May 2017 06:04 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces-ietf-ssh-owner-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive=lists.ietf.org@NetBSD.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C7E1129454 for <ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 May 2017 23:04:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zJOkyMkJVZn0 for <ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 May 2017 23:04:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netbsd.org (mail.netbsd.org [199.233.217.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2615A12944C for <secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 4 May 2017 23:04:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix, from userid 605) id B6A0584DA7; Fri, 5 May 2017 06:04:53 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ietf-ssh@netbsd.org
Received: by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1347) id 6BA5184DA4; Fri, 5 May 2017 06:04:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A12284D9C for <ietf-ssh@netbsd.org>; Thu, 4 May 2017 20:57:24 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at netbsd.org
Received: from mail.netbsd.org ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail.netbsd.org [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id MuUSwWWsEy8o for <ietf-ssh@netbsd.org>; Thu, 4 May 2017 20:57:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BDD084D81 for <ietf-ssh@netbsd.org>; Thu, 4 May 2017 20:57:19 +0000 (UTC)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from thunderbird-2.linux.ds.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.9.24]:59270) by ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.139]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) id 1d6NoK-0001gk-Qi (Exim 4.89) (return-path <bjh21@cam.ac.uk>); Thu, 04 May 2017 21:57:16 +0100
Received: from bjh21 (helo=localhost) by thunderbird-2.linux.ds.cam.ac.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <bjh21@cam.ac.uk>) id 1d6NoK-0007Yt-6M; Thu, 04 May 2017 21:57:16 +0100
Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 21:57:16 +0100 (BST)
From: Ben Harris <bjh21@bjh21.me.uk>
To: "Mark D. Baushke" <mdb@juniper.net>
cc: denis bider <denisbider.ietf@gmail.com>, ietf-ssh@netbsd.org, curdle <curdle@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Curdle] eddsa25519 & eddsa448 for use with SSH
In-Reply-To: <17136.1493159459@eng-mail01.juniper.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1705042155080.28960@thunderbird-2.linux.ds.cam.ac.uk>
References: <53117.1493095177@eng-mail01.juniper.net> <CADPMZDBEasXekZv9kGTJdArxy8CCy-sZnTY4yjtGvy39sftHDQ@mail.gmail.com> <17136.1493159459@eng-mail01.juniper.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Sender: ietf-ssh-owner@NetBSD.org
List-Id: ietf-ssh.NetBSD.org
Precedence: list
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@NetBSD.org?subject=Unsubscribe%20ietf-ssh&body=unsubscribe%20ietf-ssh>

On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Mark D. Baushke wrote:

> denis bider <denisbider.ietf@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I believe the spec for ssh-ed25519 is already an active draft under
>> the purview of Curdle:
>>
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-ed25519-00
>
> You are correct. This one is expired. I wonder if Ben Harris is likely
> to resubmit it?

I'm not in any imminent danger of doing so.  If someone were to pick it up 
and make it useful I would be very happy, but I'm a bit short of energy 
for navigating bureaucracies at the moment.

-- 
Ben Harris