IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: secsh wg status

Mouse <mouse@Rodents-Montreal.ORG> Thu, 23 March 2017 06:54 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces-ietf-ssh-owner-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive=lists.ietf.org@NetBSD.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C34127843 for <ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 23:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uMiblhPxMA1J for <ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 23:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netbsd.org (mail.netbsd.org [199.233.217.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AED212420B for <secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 23:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix, from userid 605) id DA325855FB; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 06:54:14 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ietf-ssh@netbsd.org
Received: by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1347) id 93C1B855F8; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 06:54:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 852FD855EB for <ietf-ssh@netbsd.org>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 13:34:47 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at netbsd.org
Received: from mail.netbsd.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.netbsd.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id 0I48t2GgtVxN for <ietf-ssh@netbsd.org>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 13:34:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from Stone.Rodents-Montreal.ORG (Stone.Rodents-Montreal.ORG [98.124.61.89]) by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A846484CEA for <ietf-ssh@netbsd.org>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 13:34:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (from mouse@localhost) by Stone.Rodents-Montreal.ORG (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA23120; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:34:45 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:34:45 -0400
From: Mouse <mouse@Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
Message-Id: <201703221334.JAA23120@Stone.Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Erik-Conspiracy: There is no Conspiracy - and if there were I wouldn't be part of it anyway.
X-Message-Flag: Microsoft: the company who gave us the botnet zombies.
X-Composition-Start-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:24:03 -0400 (EDT)
To: ietf-ssh@netbsd.org
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: secsh wg status
In-Reply-To: <64d6da52-bed1-1388-383e-5023b07c8311@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <CAOp4FwTXBST6iz0b8+aBSG+WVDEWb3Ox1+59fK1XT39GKznsnA@mail.gmail.com> <64d6da52-bed1-1388-383e-5023b07c8311@cs.tcd.ie>
Sender: ietf-ssh-owner@NetBSD.org
List-Id: ietf-ssh.NetBSD.org
Precedence: list

>> The secsh wg has been declared as "concluded" [...]
> If there're enough folks who want to do enough good work to justify
> the IETF WG being reformed, [...]

Personally, and as an implementer, I see no current need for a WG
(especially given the general direction I see IETF going), but it does
sound good to me to keep the mailing list alive.  I do want to talk ssh
implementations occasionally, albeit no more than occasionally.

/~\ The ASCII				  Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML		mouse@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email