IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Reference for UTF8 in SSH UTF8 terminal mode

Ron Frederick <ronf@timeheart.net> Tue, 13 December 2016 15:18 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces-ietf-ssh-owner-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive=lists.ietf.org@NetBSD.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEEA6129B68 for <ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 07:18:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=timeheart.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iO52IoQR7L9W for <ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 07:18:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.netbsd.org (mail.netbsd.org [199.233.217.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B20E12985D for <secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 07:18:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix, from userid 605) id 6D0348558B; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 15:18:39 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ietf-ssh@netbsd.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3E885587 for <ietf-ssh@netbsd.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 15:18:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at netbsd.org
Authentication-Results: mail.netbsd.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=timeheart.net
Received: from mail.netbsd.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.netbsd.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id 3d5y-DdiGLV1 for <ietf-ssh@netbsd.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 15:18:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22b.google.com (mail-pg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C8C98556D for <ietf-ssh@netbsd.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 15:18:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id f188so48611012pgc.3 for <ietf-ssh@netbsd.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 07:18:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=timeheart.net; s=mail; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=QyxG8SXIQ+OarC0ZVgCfAvj1dfY6bd53kmKRyCXe4/Y=; b=G2G3shyDA8gGzYdl0RoG0cFfqGKx8y/mwgTz9+16XySx+KRbCArWNzkYsNAW2ljwFE 4EiQJPtqJGTOJ5V6bQEiwB0v1WdM4XRZ/GI3T14jZe8P2VpgyUk9jup0snV2gYiuXV/C TDGFydh7fbPM3GM6BoLQO80GSS9oLMj1Qk1y4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=QyxG8SXIQ+OarC0ZVgCfAvj1dfY6bd53kmKRyCXe4/Y=; b=JyDfBzxQQxoFX4mKUyxDqPzbvn+ikyr3T7LtTMbqgvaDjXVMx7CyYbBkDtTMquo0K1 0wBE9gzy7BuybM2/4g7lehSll7squUEMpImSeZmqCtUUBoMrEn4axoIo4d3KlVj38Jnv NfgWAyzfjBz8uDurU+Bv4CZI4noPhFzzUMfFwqjfns3uUrnO7r5HCfOzMRaMcXqYvMcM IltD6SwTeWVUBlTopfhNdc4mcJC22KNzGUIhxg/TpN0Mq6cP8YUXPVe8eQTuRrkYdeK4 TWWhsLVlYs2urF7HhMIaQqpdYaxWP/YLZkztpnaeXaomay2awvVxjTmebqJq7s1MeEdN 2KEA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03U5uUF0CJjteFpPb8h9t1hWgE7UkHHtzXWJcUz3tv2D29MnLoTnL0cK2VbtDd/YQ==
X-Received: by 10.99.137.66 with SMTP id v63mr177427335pgd.117.1481642314624; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 07:18:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4282:2200:cfa:5497:d692:7eeb? ([2601:647:4282:2200:cfa:5497:d692:7eeb]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z9sm81337655pge.44.2016.12.13.07.18.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 13 Dec 2016 07:18:34 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
Subject: Re: Reference for UTF8 in SSH UTF8 terminal mode
From: Ron Frederick <ronf@timeheart.net>
In-Reply-To: <D1F0ECE1-C012-4443-9E86-2E3D25C34AA9@juniper.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 07:18:32 -0800
Cc: Mark Baushke <mdb@juniper.net>, "ietf-ssh@NetBSD.org" <ietf-ssh@NetBSD.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E5C97FAA-EBA4-48B3-BCFB-C87C132F9345@timeheart.net>
References: <2DD56D786E600F45AC6BDE7DA4E8A8C117FE79EF@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <201612101259.HAA17917@Stone.Rodents-Montreal.ORG> <2DD56D786E600F45AC6BDE7DA4E8A8C117FF2172@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <6353B598-245B-4D12-80E1-69323700C862@timeheart.net> <2DD56D786E600F45AC6BDE7DA4E8A8C117FF21A4@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <D1F0ECE1-C012-4443-9E86-2E3D25C34AA9@juniper.net>
To: Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
Sender: ietf-ssh-owner@NetBSD.org
List-Id: ietf-ssh.NetBSD.org
Precedence: list

On Dec 12, 2016, at 10:24 PM, Mark Baushke <mdb@juniper.net> wrote:
>> On Dec 12, 2016, at 11:58 AM, Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Apology for the confusion. So my understanding of the problem is that using RFC3629 as a reference for the UTF-8 is not convenient as its two normative references need to be updated. The two references in question are: ISO/IEC 10646:2014 and Unicode. However from this thread, I am hearing that the major concern is about providing a updated reference for Unicode, not so much ISO/IEC 10646. As a result,
>> 
>> I propose to have the following references:
>> 
>> RFC3629 as normative
>> [UNICODE]  The Unicode Consortium. The Unicode Standard.
>>              <http://www.unicode.org/versions/latest/> as informational.
>> 
> 
> I like it.
> 
>> A more recent version of ISO/IEC 10646 will be done by refreshing RFC3629.
> 
> Yes.
> 
>> Am I correct ?
> 
> It seems like a good plan to me.


Sounds good here as well. Thanks!
-- 
Ron Frederick
ronf@timeheart.net

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email