IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sedate] Can offsets like [+02:00] be used instead of IANA names in brackets?

Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net> Mon, 21 March 2022 18:00 UTC

Return-Path: <resnick@episteme.net>
X-Original-To: sedate@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sedate@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 639F73A11C7 for <sedate@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 11:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=episteme.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h1nJQoWK4eCP for <sedate@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 11:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from helm.helm.episteme.net (helm.helm.episteme.net [209.51.32.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EC4A3A1143 for <sedate@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 11:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=episteme.net; s=mail; t=1647885632; bh=XhD2rd3QVl4q/9Rg5NFrqeS0n3brHjagIFZ4sH8sIgA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=YdJa9qA0zhQ0QDxGllb65LBU2pfFsdCAgTa1wSEwjheBE6L0vjq74sNrpAjo4nXho PFvd3tMkRE/KD913wKbCnkufbAqOOwPvLXL83BTA0gBxRch/bE80PqNi3ucMNjKblP RUGdXRHy2BSM1+VhnDhwZQxkvGp7Q0atXpBXgXAU=
From: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
To: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
Cc: Michael Douglass <mikeadouglass@gmail.com>, sedate@ietf.org, Tim Parenti <tim@timtimeonline.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 19:00:22 +0100
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5878)
Message-ID: <B62F524C-CF91-4459-8CFA-FB2FD300A237@episteme.net>
In-Reply-To: <4cb0b116-daa2-517f-4a5e-eee56cb3c46b@cs.ucla.edu>
References: <CACy7CfhJ4tPjexbtN45mv+3gNuY46NnZfM7OTDP2e9uzfmzs=Q@mail.gmail.com> <f2dadb29-81ba-6f8c-e4f2-bd13db9af614@gmail.com> <4cb0b116-daa2-517f-4a5e-eee56cb3c46b@cs.ucla.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sedate/Y652vo3ros6w0ZMYKl8kIqHTcKs>
Subject: Re: [Sedate] Can offsets like [+02:00] be used instead of IANA names in brackets?
X-BeenThere: sedate@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Serialising Extended Data About Times and Events <sedate.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sedate>, <mailto:sedate-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sedate/>
List-Post: <mailto:sedate@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sedate-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sedate>, <mailto:sedate-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 18:00:41 -0000

On 18 Mar 2022, at 21:01, Paul Eggert wrote:

> I know of at least two efforts to fork TZDB, though none have 
> published official versions yet. If and when that happens, you may 
> also need to specify the source for your TZDB data to specify what the 
> mapping is.

Is this something that has been communicated to the IAB? Seems like some 
"liaising" might be in order. Having conflicting forks seems less than 
ideal.

pr
-- 
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email