[sfc] Fwd: Directorate Early Reviews

Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Thu, 13 October 2022 16:00 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB9AC1524D0; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 09:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.807
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.807 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id We1Lki3hj7oC; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 09:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DACCC1524DA; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 09:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MpDk96wzwz6G9KK; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 09:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1665676801; bh=1ic1C5roUJzlyT94Py4whYj+ch0hWylX3mE8TlixKDE=; h=Date:Subject:References:To:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=q6vVRZvTwuH6xmvW93u3Y23Yd3WqHALu1O13Mi5UF1Qkxz/tuFNcAAWIqbDrTn62w 65TXB3NjbXvvzzSsuuSehXAkCFKCFiK6uZOKX55aP0L+K9PERCWpm9Y5Q8pppAWRrF 8yf49Z3M7hEYWe7hWLad+FUrSgMFsrIiwVWDavFY=
X-Quarantine-ID: <9WaPNOaYZ-nx>
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at a2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.23.73] (unknown [50.233.136.230]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4MpDk92N58z6Gn92; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 09:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------EXNEplnWlc3spGYgSbe3iM6I"
Message-ID: <59067bb9-2e99-7d18-11c0-fc4f573731f3@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 12:00:00 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.2
Content-Language: en-US
References: <AM7PR03MB6451605AB56AFC67424797A3EE229@AM7PR03MB6451.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
To: SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>, "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>, "savnet@ietf.org" <savnet@ietf.org>
From: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM7PR03MB6451605AB56AFC67424797A3EE229@AM7PR03MB6451.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <AM7PR03MB6451605AB56AFC67424797A3EE229@AM7PR03MB6451.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/07hDQdvNYPcnPuY2nPrB8TdOnPw>
Subject: [sfc] Fwd: Directorate Early Reviews
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 16:00:06 -0000

For your information, the Routing ADs have announced the below policy 
and recommendations.

Yours,

Joel



-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	Directorate Early Reviews

	

	

	
Date: 	Wed, 12 Oct 2022 07:29:38 +0000
From: 	Andrew Alston - IETF <andrew-ietf@liquid.tech>
To: 	rtg-chairs@ietf.org <rtg-chairs@ietf.org>



Hi All,

Following the helpful feedback received during chair’s meeting and 
further discussion between the routing AD’s, we would like to propose 
the following:

 1. We will require early directorate reviews before documents come to
    the AD’s to enter the publication queue
 2. We suggest that these reviews are done either in parallel with the
    working group last call or between the working group last call and
    publication request
     1. In the case of the early directorate review being done in
        parallel with the last call, it is suggested to use this
        approach only if there is indication that the document is
        stable, since we ask that the early review is done on the
        version of the document that will be received by the AD’s at the
        time of requested publication.
 3. While we require early review from the routing directorate, it is in
    the chair’s discretion if they wish to request early review from
    other directorates.  As a guideline, we recommend a security
    directorate review in addition to the routing area directorate.

We are still discussing all the feedback (and there was a lot of 
substantive feedback), so expect more from us in the coming weeks 
regarding the rest of the feedback.

Thanks

Andrew Alston (On Behalf of the Routing AD’s)


Internal All Employees