Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

 +1, as a co-author.

Cheers,
Tal.

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Aviv Kfir <avivk@mellanox.com> wrote:

> Support !
>
> Regards,
> Aviv
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
> Sent: Montag, 7. Mai 2018 14:28
> To: draft-brockners-proof-of-transit@ietf.org; sfc-chairs@ietf.org;
> sfc@ietf.org
> Subject: The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state
> "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
>
>
> The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state Call For
> Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Joel Halpern)
>
> The document is available at
> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-
> brockners-proof-of-transit%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cavivk%40mellanox.com%
> 7C15c2a4d0e17346b3dfc708d5b994c226%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d149256f
> 461b%7C0%7C0%7C636618970919698641&sdata=WdBM0Lf7d%
> 2FR0aHeNQEzvV4ijcLN8QMvM%2B7hxpzGtbwc%3D&reserved=0
>
> Comment:
> As discussed in London, and requested by the document authors, this is a
> two week call for adoption for this document. Reminder: the question is not
> whether this is done, but rather whether this is a good start on work the
> working group would like to advance.
>
> Please speak up.  Silence is NOT consent.
> Given the long list of authors, the chairs particularly need to hear from
> non-authors.
>
> Yours,
> Joel (& Jim)
>
> PS: The issue of there being too many authors will be dealt with
> separately.
> That is not an obstacle to adoption, merely an annoyance to the chairs.
> _______________________________________________
> sfc mailing list
> sfc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
>