[sfc] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-04.txt
Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Wed, 29 August 2018 23:36 UTC
Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9317130DF4 for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 16:36:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E9ZLJ8vMW5sR for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 16:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x243.google.com (mail-lj1-x243.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7600B130DC8 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 16:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x243.google.com with SMTP id v26-v6so5761272ljj.3 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 16:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=JvxDvq4svlHYLJF97YLZ/5hQOV43ZqU8QDY5KBhaTLo=; b=bkAxRyxdPbSOP13Ou4tTb0FcKNvBtMN1xQClKxu7ISbfUeX0ITby1yHeWS7CxyNDQV +NShiCd+1Y77rWS3HCtyq5TuvmrncSGYYca5N/j+dZCaDZQS3KMO0A3qodUdw/eT0pyK 1xUgy7ZH7k0FGPul89Didief+S6RQNZu/zWUN+T+Lc7IRJGQL3Z/IahBZnQXnTfIAYEw a/7Adgwl2Kwju2qNRmaMndrAzNITZYVVY7SRT20SBcjCzN4c0GlB5AHRcMj1dzKpyNQc 4Fo0noo8gfC8iI19ATfyLBIk1uOVH5TmpdUuNPrQafR386LRCdnqHdPf93HHusGUyI15 +cKQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=JvxDvq4svlHYLJF97YLZ/5hQOV43ZqU8QDY5KBhaTLo=; b=uBxJL64vmR6xnv3QFNkn7lRiBJ5uhtLM8ygQtU3BXEtIShtVA185SeiRWBc8q+pEPJ PA8/TW2nk15yI/C2Is2s6XZAhI+9EJOwycKQ0eyUazVvYZlxt8Vx5+sgFK/eAFPpIwNr oNn9BuhQD3YwrFBgcPjvaep7hsCJBvbgg0KH7b68DDeyatrimNlcURUmVLw6eIaNTjV4 RdBGrYVduKNuwJdal3EUCSkjXBp9zDW2WV0O0K6Vf1QzKJFIUVh/dIVGRyKLg9bh+vMK pedGkUPtdT84MtRNXSCoOkZOHwf6U+mQYD7M++KvixrsXkDg4x2egbOV9vW9/+vjDX8G vZsA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51CiyjNQMWqBT94g4Mw7CAWqaMibvCz1BqtF1Xze+3zk5DeAVjIQ BBDouqvyRNK5WhytN7AuZZEuBfRdalMU1/AhcZfXRg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdaEgb82trXr82eew8N5Yz+SUSHZfkxSsyG7ZNW69J/wZjRHgHJjsARoQ2CHrR8Y0YRpYjGGn1m6Shgvn3s5M8o=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8:: with SMTP id 8-v6mr5609785lja.112.1535585813031; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 16:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a2e:709:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 16:36:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <153558065399.14882.13685091578250455914.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <153558065399.14882.13685091578250455914.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 16:36:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmW=7O6F_SoEvr5VxT+=GRBJUueh-CxBgno45m6=Qy+__w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Service Function Chaining IETF list <sfc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e86fcd05749b6e20"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/2Mp81to71oktnOVqUWmOMUJZeyA>
Subject: [sfc] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-04.txt
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 23:36:58 -0000
Dear All, changes in this update are editorial. The document explains the application of the Alternate Marking method (RFC 8321) in SFC domain. Also, we use AMM to illustrate the value of the Residence Time and its variation as a performance metric to monitor and control end-to-end SFP, SFF, and SF delay and delay variation. Your comments, questions, suggestions always welcome and much appreciated. Dear WG Chairs, we, the authors, believe that the document is ready for WG adoption call. Greatly appreciate your kind consideration. Regards, Greg ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org> Date: Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 3:10 PM Subject: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-04.txt To: Gregory Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>, Tal Mizrahi < tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com>, Giuseppe Fioccola < giuseppe.fioccola@telecomitalia.it> A new version of I-D, draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-04.txt has been successfully submitted by Greg Mirsky and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm Revision: 04 Title: Performance Measurement (PM) with Alternate Marking Method in Service Function Chaining (SFC) Domain Document date: 2018-08-29 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 8 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm- 04.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-04 Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-04 Abstract: This document describes how the alternate marking method be used as the passive performance measurement method in a Service Function Chaining (SFC) domain. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat