[sfc] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-12.txt

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Sun, 10 January 2021 21:33 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B853A3A1300; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 13:33:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lq9Ih7vo9gI8; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 13:33:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x229.google.com (mail-lj1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3DD23A12FF; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 13:33:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x229.google.com with SMTP id m10so1421765lji.1; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 13:33:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=UXaQLp8vnyLTxViNDvqUX5MJvBccbiYBrbY5s4j5y3w=; b=gxGIB1KsAz2qa1W0v7Dnf7rpiwBhk35Itm75X9XdUdW2c0yY3P+Lkmi8wPEbaKxckF O9qgMvC8m6wPpOKn2t9wo7zLXbenhTpmhhmRYUhTFv3anoC5csinq8Mh1p/z6QHSvjxs r64DhPbZbUsfrQt9rL0TrY+Exv7Kmom0kNkFd+/OQXW2RUo0imZZmKDgn0h5Z0Xj0C3X G+JTql36StQxQpVhy5Wd7/mMzC1nje7U4hYvisNHoCoBxJM6bZkRcB3oMZYhGaBlYzN3 BqPMVF8yQG/YhNAAMWxcJcTMLBlg7XbW9ZPgAWJBHbfcXpDjkDzVpuwjYaTIdMwfJhki JoCA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=UXaQLp8vnyLTxViNDvqUX5MJvBccbiYBrbY5s4j5y3w=; b=jp4/Q5VZnDpDQ/R+Ee3erN5ebVwkblmV6EHOLgLMhlBHh0GZ57aFgOcrx56Xlmr78E IvgihJIXugCliALHHRWVt3fiErNGCnqGixoaAKSqiR9uWa5iPV7M0YluBbTtSN/2iYce KdpClfGMH++6XvDHbq5L4738JOs+el0isD7lXI3uxkw89exUx8ICPlhQSQc+DRBHJayk Y+HLWJV+7PPy4fzGB+gLcN0hsu2QhYVEGNJs4m1ISDniKTchdN+6/iEcDe9XgfRjz2mE Z4hYQ8Bazr8tLoARtdgFrc7wP2fJOv9joKWlx4pMl0M6r43KxSBIZpcf4LdznFfiZaIS g0ow==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5300G9g+0mpMBu8tvmAI4rCNjHpdT8Fnsnjy5zK5KrtbMbH2//z4 NwJgieEMriyuIFH0uP104+KIk55drRl9wMwoSrAkkL2taK8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyF0SCuPM4BjS0tAxg5IMUTqIYogBs2PWtGN6N53O8YTp0fKIo2O/tAMlDU7lmDlAVA6oFPwqiz1yUJ4RmrTgo=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:7102:: with SMTP id m2mr6387559ljc.245.1610314383352; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 13:33:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161031387883.5592.13651732241252204862@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <161031387883.5592.13651732241252204862@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 13:32:53 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmWkQr115GJWgjaeH7tKMcX3o5JpwGBGEVW8moVt0B2HOQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Service Function Chaining IETF list <sfc@ietf.org>, sfc-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cbe53705b892881b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/3hxg1FN6PX8j2xOqP1w1GkeNipQ>
Subject: [sfc] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-12.txt
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 21:33:08 -0000

Dear All,
this version includes the case of a re-classification along the SFP which
is being monitored using the Alternate Marking method.
Always welcome your questions, comments, and suggestions.

The authors believe that the document is stable and would appreciate the
consideration for WG AP.

Regards,
Greg

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 1:24 PM
Subject: [sfc] I-D Action: draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-12.txt
To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: <sfc@ietf.org>



A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
This draft is a work item of the Service Function Chaining WG of the IETF.

        Title           : Performance Measurement (PM) with Alternate
Marking Method in Service Function Chaining (SFC) Domain
        Authors         : Greg Mirsky
                          Giuseppe Fioccola
                          Tal Mizrahi
        Filename        : draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-12.txt
        Pages           : 8
        Date            : 2021-01-10

Abstract:
   This document describes how the alternate marking method can be used
   as the efficient performance measurement method taking advantage of
   the actual data flows in a Service Function Chaining (SFC) domain.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-12
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-12

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-12


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/


_______________________________________________
sfc mailing list
sfc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc