Re: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity

wei.yuehua@zte.com.cn Thu, 04 February 2021 02:17 UTC

Return-Path: <wei.yuehua@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE113A10FA for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 18:17:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.917
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.917 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zzZa8eHO1JEL for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 18:17:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxde.zte.com.cn (mxde.zte.com.cn [209.9.37.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2434B3A10F6 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 18:17:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mse-eu.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.35.13.51]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 3741CA3867245F5CC00E; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 10:17:42 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dgapp01.zte.com.cn ([10.35.13.16]) by mse-eu.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 1142HbSv065399; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 10:17:37 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from wei.yuehua@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (dgapp01[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid1; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 10:17:38 +0800 (CST)
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 10:17:38 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2af9601b5942ff871393
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202102041017385906814@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <48b9f1db-38cb-7703-3c1e-7d2e75f93d19@joelhalpern.com>
References: 161184769798.6893.13499187160157088449@ietfa.amsl.com, 48b9f1db-38cb-7703-3c1e-7d2e75f93d19@joelhalpern.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: wei.yuehua@zte.com.cn
To: jmh@joelhalpern.com, sfc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-eu.zte.com.cn 1142HbSv065399
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/6u40wawRUBXBFIJuflvFghOzqek>
Subject: Re: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 02:17:49 -0000

Dear all,



I read through the latest draft, Everything looks good. 


I support progressing this document to publication.







Best Regards,

Yuehua Wei


M: +86 13851460269 E: wei.yuehua@zte.com.cn










原始邮件



发件人:JoelM.Halpern
收件人:sfc@ietf.org;
日 期 :2021年01月28日 23:41
主 题 :[sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity


As you can see below, the SFC Chairs have started the WG last Call for  
the nsh-integrity draft.  Please respond.
Thank you,
Joel
 
 
-------- Forwarded Message -------
 
 
The IETF WG state of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity has been changed to "In WG
Last Call" from "WG Document" by Joel Halpern:
 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity/
 
Comment:
This starts the SFC Working Group last call for the NSH integrity protection
document.  This will run through the end of the day February 11, 2021.  
(Don't worry about time zone.  If it is still Feb 11 2021 somewhere in the
world, you can send in comments.)  Please respond.  Silence is not consent,
and when (if, but we hope when) we send this to the AD, we need to be  
able to
describe meaningful WG support for the publication.  And if possible, more
than just +1.
 
Thank you,
Joel (and Jim)
 
_______________________________________________
sfc mailing list
sfc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc