[sfc] Fwd: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16.txt

[Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]>]

Dear Joel and Jim,
I'm forwarding the response to the IPR poll from Bhumip Khasnabish.

Regards,
Greg

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: B. Khasnabish <[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 11:24 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: [sfc] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16.txt
To: Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]>
Cc: <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, Kent Leung (kleung) <
[e-mail]>, Mishra, Gyan S <[e-mail]>, Linda Wang <
[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, Gyan Mishra <
[e-mail]>




Hi Greg,

Thanks and yes, I support the publication of this draft as an Individual
Contributor.
Also, do not have any IPR to declare.

Once again, many Thanks in advance. Best Regards,
Bhumip

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bhumip  <https://about.me/bhumip>Khasnabish | [phone] (m)
[e-mail]



On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 3:58 PM Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Dear All,
> I much appreciate your help responding to SFC WG Chair question about the
> IPR related to draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam. If you are not currently
> subscribed to the SFC WG mailing list, please feel free to send your
> response to the IPR question to me replying to this mail. I'll forward your
> response to SFC WG Chairs promptly.
>
> Thank you for your help.
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 7:37 AM Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>> I hope this note finds you well.
>> It has been a long work on this draft, and we're moving to the finish
>> line, we are getting closer to the publication. I much appreciate your
>> contributions to this document. As you may have noticed, the document now
>> includes also the consistency and return path extensions. That was the only
>> chance to have these published. As a result, I had to make a hard choice to
>> keep the number of names on the front page under control (five is the
>> recommended limit). It is IETF practice to credit contributors in a
>> separate section. So, I've done that. I hope you understand.
>> At this time, I greatly appreciate your help and timely response to the
>> IPR poll by stating "I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this
>> draft". Also, in a separate thread
>> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/tcR6qBAkoQZfvn8JQ5TE6-dj4aU/>,
>> you can express your support for the publication of this draft.
>> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Greg
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> From: Joel M. Halpern <[e-mail]>
>> Date: Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 11:02 AM
>> Subject: Re: Fwd: [sfc] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16.txt
>> To: Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]>, Service Function Chaining IETF
>> list <[e-mail]>
>>
>>
>> While we are conducting the last call, and deciding who will shepherd
>> this document...
>> 1) If anyone would like to shepherd it, please let me or Jim know.
>> 2) Would the authors and key contributors please confirm to the lsit
>> that all known relevant IPR has been disclosed.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Joel
>>
>> On 10/19/2021 12:39 PM, Greg Mirsky wrote:
>> > Dear Jim and Joel,
>> > we've completed merging the substantive parts of two SFC OAM drafts.
>> > Many thanks to Med for his thorough reviews, thoughtful comments that
>> > helped us improve the document. The authors believe that the draft is
>> > stable and is ready for the WG LC. We greatly appreciate your
>> > consideration of starting the WG LC and are committed to addressing
>> > questions and comments.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Greg (on behalf off the authors)
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> > From: <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>> > Date: Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 9:33 AM
>> > Subject: [sfc] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16.txt
>> > To: <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>> > Cc: <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> > directories.
>> > This draft is a work item of the Service Function Chaining WG of the
>> IETF.
>> >
>> >          Title           : Active OAM for Service Function Chaining
>> >          Authors         : Greg Mirsky
>> >                            Wei Meng
>> >                            Ting Ao
>> >                            Kent Leung
>> >                            Gyan Mishra
>> >          Filename        : draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16.txt
>> >          Pages           : 37
>> >          Date            : 2021-10-19
>> >
>> > Abstract:
>> >     A set of requirements for active Operation, Administration, and
>> >     Maintenance (OAM) of Service Function Chains (SFCs) in a network is
>> >     presented in this document.  Based on these requirements, an
>> >     encapsulation of active OAM messages in SFC and a mechanism to
>> detect
>> >     and localize defects are described.
>> >
>> >     This document updates RFC 8300.  Particularly, it updates the
>> >     definition of O (OAM) bit in the Network Service Header (NSH) (RFC
>> >     8300) and defines how an active OAM message is identified in the
>> NSH.
>> >
>> >
>> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam/
>> > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam/>
>> >
>> > There is also an HTML version available at:
>> > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16.html
>> > <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16.html
>> >
>> >
>> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16
>> > <https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16>
>> >
>> >
>> > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ <
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/>
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > sfc mailing list
>> > [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
>> > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>
>>
>