[sfc] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-08.txt
Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Thu, 21 January 2021 16:53 UTC
Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722C73A12B8; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 08:53:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pNyAFwCiG3Ka; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 08:53:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12f.google.com (mail-lf1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65E6C3A128A; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 08:53:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id b26so3446103lff.9; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 08:53:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=IeOVeIgZGenxXVJxupr+tZAZUKe0GmTP57D8Yz+yoBA=; b=N8RC5T6RBG/L3/vQ1PMJel+TelEWe4mtib7ITta2aX2QWVKszfBcqgnTf7baVNas9T iognJMyZOOIkYrtiEGoD2RkfwtfAk2/BVV1N+EmmodaTGkUBdv8d5xZE2RpIrsUda+tV P77F4r7QENu3VjbqHuCEOEAg+QNmPOT+Mk+fQdjVn4zAeZKEjJnZFnDluEuBsbl0sBgR 0/2t/98SQhG9DU2qD28XnkM9Nm+s4OKZgRGVBeadRXc7lgkuKNs+DIZTAtd4Giyo2Fef 0EeJCPmZQM4FyHUXy6X1Cy3Q7ljy/R6qkte/DhkFspuccU8wt0BnBbi91gndyRj6mbni DHew==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=IeOVeIgZGenxXVJxupr+tZAZUKe0GmTP57D8Yz+yoBA=; b=jpElE43O9N2C1DPXG/kI5GX6Hu6JsrnxIGLnemUq3hsWD125V11OeYOdTT3illrmp2 iZu5DS7BvPa3tmQc3nb0Pyw+GAZ6JJ2iURcM9M0MXZA74Hav2Wnya5qjqCmMepUQtNpv mu2wSGNmNE1QLjvSvTPnIAYeE7CZktdnU6WqgaaFrKMftVPF/6TYPEU+xwMNzlsO9Oh2 FHkIXvKnaePIM30zyleDGOVPewzkGWMTSJxO6Cclz16TkasnXcqOOxmYX658MPKDI7mk 9l1egnZD9zEQYDftk3MMxcMe+0UDgttVIKIMXZV0FHqjIfzGW+TBQ0KmbYo1YOkmVCui 3/mg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530P5u3WnEYUMlFYiNUcdv5PA4Fkv7nXidJ64hS+fdQtjgqzMXYI UAGdBCYZdex94aWWe2KEgjNnB15O6HG22kZRQwhu8sPrbMfvtg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzuFZyDSoyMwzL+bVFs/iE322ByVKphi7sLRkAgv6sx2TheuHfVEkJnlCwNjhI3JqzU/TkAAGTGJFhh49MQjjE=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5ca1:: with SMTP id e1mr64293lfq.192.1611247994666; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 08:53:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161112518048.17156.14244776558457199900@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <161112518048.17156.14244776558457199900@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 08:53:03 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmX2rB6dKeHz12OKBpYtT1Uuc527ytjCVJxNSc=DLgBi0w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Service Function Chaining IETF list <sfc@ietf.org>, sfc-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005e01de05b96be859"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/8TmGFUse41lcMpn5wpnNz3a__Qk>
Subject: [sfc] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-08.txt
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 16:53:19 -0000
Dear All, updates in the new version address comments from Med (many thanks, Med). Now, for the integrity protection of SFC active OAM and the Echo Request/Reply refer to draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity and use one of defined in that draft MAC Context Headers. Resulting from that update, updated related draft-ao-sfc-oam-path-consistency, and draft-ao-sfc-oam-return-path-specified to use the same integrity protection mechanism. The authors of all these drafts much appreciate your comments, suggestions. We also believe that these drafts provide the essential OAM functionality for NSH-based SFC environments and appreciate steps to progress drafts further. Regards, Greg ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org> Date: Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 10:46 PM Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-08.txt To: Cui(Linda) Wang <lindawangjoy@gmail.com>, Bhumip Khasnabish < vumip1@gmail.com>, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>, Wei Meng < meng.wei2@zte.com.cn> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-08.txt has been successfully submitted by Greg Mirsky and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam Revision: 08 Title: Active OAM for Service Function Chains in Networks Document date: 2021-01-19 Group: sfc Pages: 21 URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-08.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam/ Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-08 Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-08 Abstract: A set of requirements for active Operation, Administration and Maintenance (OAM) of Service Function Chains (SFCs) in networks is presented. Based on these requirements, an encapsulation of active OAM message in SFC and a mechanism to detect and localize defects described. Also, this document updates RFC 8300 in the definition of O (OAM) bit in the Network Service Header (NSH) and defines how the active OAM message is identified in SFC NSH. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat