Re: [sfc] Way forward for draft-ao-sfc-oam-return-path-specified
Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Fri, 11 June 2021 03:27 UTC
Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9013A25BD for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 20:27:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.086
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.086 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IX995drA_Ph8 for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 20:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42d.google.com (mail-pf1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD5273A25BC for <sfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 20:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id x73so3302500pfc.8 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 20:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yUU66YZyey1bTrce1aElF1SN1T/soLDYDG505oi55co=; b=erGSL4K+IMC/6DxL2fwVaqevc6KQ8qJLZW3RF3ufLuTtIgUDtiobW5Pxw3l7dr7awL IfssiePbh8rTVoq/zeiO0LIS/YeQ0163ceq+xkuB0B9wtKMS7LiABea9aC6II1ljpFsW KxzZuj8i0yPQSOHCS7PJJKw9yOfE9jH5dTxLKSFGsLcmdoBVznD9Kbk6bcQ3PcIXnGUM XSwQxcID9mUGDImEBnQAYE/P8RtaTwUOoXICOZGSbVoeFZ6h6px8d+dOY32GiaaxGZ1Q IhPOnuOWLxnHby2VkQy05vbq0eEaMRKX3JR5zw8lwGiGTDt3ykOBOY5MpbZn8ZoL1OVn UKFw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yUU66YZyey1bTrce1aElF1SN1T/soLDYDG505oi55co=; b=AERG4E05wFF5goL3Jy3jRlQhciCVWeJ+Ig/DBsEIAmSTL6DFZdrRteYWDd7lvDReLW HmJsMXMjhcb3EjXFdO+0KaM58PfnFzruuea9AhLNMMv9kBTzGqy1nGNcZFqUKLeqOIF2 vHohuOhTBfY8bHyqtA2Xap/FVFAXU3+6i4Dda9RpzaurtcJoREZDSNs3T9wZaZXwsKS1 7OvzN26u8fYj1+99Etyg1fcVnAFiPYdiHlj8iEwUjOFYPv5U1/Ny08XqXNLRboL/cv/O 8tdTlc/lqsiJf3Sn+BFC1nnqcbcBZW+Y6JbD2vo8Q69+GG+UMDeJxEORv2ridihE0max QqkQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5335vv4dmRAkrRg0wNC03y1Y0ta+woOcfAh3XvC8Y9+Pl9ssHgpT dUd084GcSYgdDJporB6PtgI8agpRrvd/zCZUgGU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyEAf0BYYNyFZKJm6DDfow5JMvaDheUUAY+arp86aEUtH2VS93I6TDAyUEPulliyQD5/t/QrQqOGgniMYlK/kA=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:e709:: with SMTP id b9mr1538822pgi.18.1623382016801; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 20:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <202105290756323443789@zte.com.cn> <2de22857-4947-7360-af5b-47f27ba2f215@joelhalpern.com> <4103_1622526357_60B5C995_4103_404_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330353954CE@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <4103_1622526357_60B5C995_4103_404_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330353954CE@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 23:26:46 -0400
Message-ID: <CABNhwV2vN7DpeeJCCq8PtrLK+W9wRxHBE6Mp_G4+psu5YBS6uA@mail.gmail.com>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
Cc: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, "gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com" <gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com>, "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000072405e05c4751475"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/9WFcyJXmRXUYaudMMiyJt-RbNMM>
Subject: Re: [sfc] Way forward for draft-ao-sfc-oam-return-path-specified
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 03:27:04 -0000
Hi Greg, Med, Joel, all As co-author of “draft-so-sfc-oam” I support moving the two TLVs to the multi layer oam draft. As Greg mentioned and I agree that both drafts could progress separately and there maybe an advantage of doing so. I think from the WG feedback we would have to determine those advantages if we decide to keep separate. I will noodle that some more as well. Kind Regards Gyan On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 1:46 AM <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote: > Hi Joel, all, > > I support moving these two TLVs to the main OAM document. Thanks. > > Cheers, > Med > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : Joel M. Halpern [mailto:jmh@joelhalpern.com] > > Envoyé : samedi 29 mai 2021 02:34 > > À : gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com; sfc@ietf.org > > Cc : BOUCADAIR Mohamed TGI/OLN <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> > > Objet : Re: Way forward for draft-ao-sfc-oam-return-path-specified > > > > While that sounds reasonable, I (and I presume Jim) would like to hear > from > > members of the working group. The base document is adopted by the WG, > > so the WG owns change control. > > Do people think adding the substantive comment from the otehr two > > referenced drafts would be helpful? > > > > Thank you, > > Joel > > > > On 5/28/2021 7:56 PM, gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com wrote: > > > Dear Jim, Joel, et al., > > > > > > in the course of discussing draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam > > > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam/>, > > > Med has pointed out that it seems useful to merge the substantive part > > > of > > > > > > draft-ao-sfc-oam-return-path-specified > > > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ao-sfc-oam-return-path-specifi > > > ed/>to > > > the draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam: > > > > > > GIM>> I propose adding informational reference > > > to draft-ao-sfc-oam-return-path-specified as follows: > > > > > > /[Med] I would prefer to have the content of > > > ao-sfc-oam-return-path-specified included in > > > draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam unless you are confident to progress > > > that I-D separately. It is up to you./ > > > > > > > > > Thinking of Med's suggestion, I've realized that the same step can be > > > considered for draft-ao-sfc-oam-path-consistency > > > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ao-sfc-oam-path-consistency/>. > > > Both individual drafts extend SFC NSH Echo Request/Reply defined in > > > draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam and might be progressed independently. > > > On the other hand, mechanisms described in these individual drafts are > > > useful in an SFC NSH. > > > > > > Much appreciate your suggestions, guidance. > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Greg Mirsky > > > > > > > > > Sr. Standardization Expert > > > 预研标准部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部 Standard Preresearch > > Dept./Wireline Product R&D > > > Institute/Wireline Product Operation Division > > > > > > > > > > > > E: gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com <mailto:gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com> > > > www.zte.com.cn <http://www.zte.com.cn/> > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez > recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages > electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou > falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged > information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and > delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been > modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > > _______________________________________________ > sfc mailing list > sfc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc > -- <http://www.verizon.com/> *Gyan Mishra* *Network Solutions A**rchitect * *Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>* *M 301 502-1347*
- [sfc] Way forward for draft-ao-sfc-oam-return-pat… gregory.mirsky
- Re: [sfc] Way forward for draft-ao-sfc-oam-return… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [sfc] Way forward for draft-ao-sfc-oam-return… wei.yuehua
- Re: [sfc] Way forward for draft-ao-sfc-oam-return… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [sfc] Way forward for draft-ao-sfc-oam-return… Gyan Mishra