[sfc] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16.txt
Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Tue, 19 October 2021 16:42 UTC
Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0EC3A0A70;
Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 6q7hAfKYxQGQ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com (mail-ed1-x533.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::533])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A194A3A0A63;
Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id ec8so15380385edb.6;
Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=OiOPz9n4NBTj8/nDH+MvIbWEOQ5f4isyfAYVGoSt/8g=;
b=L0nd5ad58PEAcs/5xAVuhksxhLCle+fPs9OQHJMAG2KGof66snRvb8CEtOFc/Uf3it
4DK84QHNPKZJOp5gua2Dyz/oWWYjP5Th+UKRjTfJraUYuVNHwlH1bXitqP3HrZdZ3dcc
Jc0Z9YJSp9y6N9JVzaB0apPgrtnnViTaNdfMFNmD81+xtJ4uZ7g0xAQwguaCCMViLAIy
vmrJn0FPYLLGbeIgEuYyCyZIXIpDXWDYS5tNs5Re2FV7u1FPMKYXNnnWLLfSo7KMgHoR
vG1qtN64jwbcwIHL0+8ZLT3I/iZAM/gYnPnUSS3YS0zSglQMBcpwXd11LXJDKj1ap7SG
YR3w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=OiOPz9n4NBTj8/nDH+MvIbWEOQ5f4isyfAYVGoSt/8g=;
b=PmoZm8TMX48HLvSWyvE79zAz71SmwWr/nVH9wz0MCFsjsQPPMHQ7K64K0waeI68W8n
IoahpcO11fgJ7hgEg3yGS91P9HUS+XxhaScPxuhwJDED73RfDHMUuxE/Q0R64l6QSwVJ
SMy5RQdkxs0zYOTSYXkL7zhK0MkESESZC3M6mkNn2zFor2/MBCjAh0D1m8Cpm4yCSGi8
w5q3NRAr7gFrFeNkDAFkxXqJFyr6b59gsiSg47uHgpwXjf328aqxZP/tCAlypPdJf1zL
L5S/LfMl2AFjKQC4Xo+TPsbV4ClaLW94avjnjNsGPiQW0+sgWhdaRf2gOirnoI2wj9bm
KRWw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Tjnx3gl3u82T+YKYHUlMmj4mw82lNi1VJvCst9wLga7oFmIIZ
9kQxiwGtPisSm66kLdeAhuSN9D/EcOWqmUNWWqXx8JPR
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxrTLkue+o00Y/jZ3hk3LTXmGPCV4aoiDuhVKuaPxxkJGDTFboVwLZL51QZ792rzIUHn+4vTiXgf8Ndc6Mo4gs=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1356:: with SMTP id
y22mr53766935edw.3.1634661561006;
Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <163466112750.7235.4587641153411151399@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <163466112750.7235.4587641153411151399@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:39:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmXVKkEfNx707k9qXk1HoPNQg2EG8RhSM75TL-nbGJ6RoQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: sfc-chairs@ietf.org, Service Function Chaining IETF list <sfc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000abfdd205ceb74df7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/9dyq02h-9cewEEJkguLASYfnRJU>
Subject: [sfc] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16.txt
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>,
<mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>,
<mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 16:42:12 -0000
Dear Jim and Joel, we've completed merging the substantive parts of two SFC OAM drafts. Many thanks to Med for his thorough reviews, thoughtful comments that helped us improve the document. The authors believe that the draft is stable and is ready for the WG LC. We greatly appreciate your consideration of starting the WG LC and are committed to addressing questions and comments. Regards, Greg (on behalf off the authors) ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org> Date: Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 9:33 AM Subject: [sfc] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16.txt To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org> Cc: <sfc@ietf.org> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Service Function Chaining WG of the IETF. Title : Active OAM for Service Function Chaining Authors : Greg Mirsky Wei Meng Ting Ao Kent Leung Gyan Mishra Filename : draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16.txt Pages : 37 Date : 2021-10-19 Abstract: A set of requirements for active Operation, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) of Service Function Chains (SFCs) in a network is presented in this document. Based on these requirements, an encapsulation of active OAM messages in SFC and a mechanism to detect and localize defects are described. This document updates RFC 8300. Particularly, it updates the definition of O (OAM) bit in the Network Service Header (NSH) (RFC 8300) and defines how an active OAM message is identified in the NSH. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam/ There is also an HTML version available at: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16.html A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ sfc mailing list sfc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
- [sfc] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-… internet-drafts
- [sfc] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-l… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [sfc] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-l… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-l… Gyan Mishra
- [sfc] Fwd: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-l… meng.wei2
- Re: [sfc] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-l… Linda Wang
- Re: [sfc] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-l… Gyan Mishra
- [sfc] Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-m… Greg Mirsky
- [sfc] Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-m… Greg Mirsky